Wash, Cut, Polish & Demagnetize


As I sat and read through the most recent threads on the "Agon" forum, I noticed a thread regarding "Glossary of Audio Myths". I noticed several comments regarding "greening" and demagnetizing CDs.

Without delving too deeply into the effects of laser light diffraction, deflection, dispersion and reflecting light from adjacent tracks creating "jitter", and to avoid reduntantly examining the fact that the aluminum "wafer" in a CD is not always just aluminum, but in many cases aluminum "alloy", I would like to attempt to dispel a few of these "myths".

Many CD manufacturing facilities use a coating of mold release agents on the manufacturing machinery and on the plastic substrate material in the actual CD to facilitate ease of handling throughout the manufacturing process. Somewhat similar to spraying a cooking pan with "PAM" to reduce sticking. The residual amounts remaining on the CD upon completion of manufacturing should be removed as it will cause minor deflection and loss of focus of the laser beam. Specialty chemicals are available specifically for this purpose. I wash the CDs thoroughly using Dawn dishwashing liquid and very warm water. I cannot confirm that this process is as effective as using the specialty chemicals, but it leaves the CD surface extremely clean and seemingly free from any "oily" feel.

I then cut the edge of the CD using an Audiodesk CD cutter. This process reduces the amount of laser scatter from exiting through the outer edge of the CD and flooding the inside of the CD transport with reflected laser light. By cutting a bevel on the edge of the CD, you actually reduce the edge surface area by which the diffracted laser light can disperse. Some may feel that this a bit excessive, but we must keep in mind that the results of these treatments are cumulative.

The next process involves applying CD "Green" to the beveled edge. The properties of the color value of the Green used in the majority of these coatings tend to absorb any stray laser light. I still, to this day, have not been able to figure out why Green is the color of choice although, I have been told that it is simply the values of each of these colors (Red laser light and Green) that work together in unison to "neutralize" the light. The initial washing of the CD also helps to enhance the adhesion of the green coatings.

Upon allowing the CD green to dry, I then apply CD diamond using 100% cotton balls, and polish using again, cotton balls. CD diamond is an optical enhancer similar to Optrix,
Vivid, etc. and also contains a anti-static component. Most of these "optical enhancers" work by simply filling in microscopic pores in the CD surface permitting a more direct transmission of the laser beam through the plastic substrate material to the actual CD surface.

The last step involves demagnetizing the CD using a Furutech RD-2 CD demagnetizer. CDs, contrary to what most people believe can and will become magnetized. The results are a less black background, a general "haze" and loss of detail. If Cds were made using pure aluminum with NO trace elements, this step might not be required.

The results of all this? Pretty damn amazing. Again, recognizing that the results of all of these steps are cumulative, when all is said and done, the improvement is quite significant. Although these steps may sound somewhat time consuming, each CD actually only takes about three minutes to complete.

I hope I have provided some insight as to "dispelling" some of these myths. I can, and will, stand by this process as time and time again these enhancements have made CDs a lot more listenable. And, I have dropped the jaws of many non-believers after they have heard the actual results.

Any comments regarding this process are welcome. Happy listening.


128x128buscis2
Sean, where did I say "mandatory?" True, most manufacturers don't use the highest grade products, but there are plenty of audiophile manufacturers than do; hence, some of those 50k speakers and things I see on Audiogon, right Albert? Someone is buying these things, right? Anyway, it would seem that "audiophile" quality CDs are not mass produced to start with and many of them are made as one-time, limited edition versions. I have some "audiophile" versions of certain CDs and I paid extra for these copies. Why aren't these made with the special extra stuff? And as far as someone filing a law suit because of sharp edges, blame that on the over abundance of greedy lawyers. Whatever happened to taking responsibility for your actions?
Matchstikman, the mods that we have been doing to these discs is somewhat pushing the boundaries of the "nonconforming". I'm sure that many CD manufacturers would attempt to discourage us from doing so. Arguments ranging from removing too much of the plastic substrate to applying polishing fluids and paint to the disc.

In my humble opinion, my standard redbook CDs after this process, rival my XRCDs, MFSLs etc. So, in response to your question regarding manufacturers doing these mods, they are already offering us their version of "audiophile quality". Whether we consider them audiophile quality is more than likely irrelevant to said manufacturers. I'm sure they feel totally comfortable selling us reissued discs of "audiophile quality" for over inflated prices. Why should they change?

Look at this with an open mind Matchstikman. These mods really do work, contrary to what some people feel. If you would like, email me. I will provide you with my address and you can send me one of your discs, and I will be more than glad to do this process for you. Then, you can establish your own opinion.

Your ears will tell you the truth devoid of any other persons opinions.
Use anti-static spectacle cleaner (or Nordost Eco, Optrix etc) on the CD loading tray. Give it a good coating and allow to dry on. Bid improvements.
A very old thread with lots of ideas. Here are some that I didn't see.

No light goes through the disc. It all gets reflected, but the pits in the disc are 1/4 wavelength deep so that the light reflected from the bottom is 180 degrees out of phase with the light from the top surface, so there is interference, which looks like no light.

In a digital error correction system, the data stream includes redundant information so that the original data can be recovered without any error, provided that the transmitted data stream error rate does not exceed that which was anticipated in design of the encoding algorithms.
As I have mentioned before, modern digital transmission systems use error correction encoding so that they can be run at far higher bandwidth that that which would be necessary if error-free transmission were needed. The higher bandwidth more than makes up for the redundant data.

I never clean or otherwise process CDs. Except for one disc that was defective when purchased, I have never had a disc that failed to play, on several players and DVDs.
I have used cleaners, many....I have the Herbie audio mat - the best that I have tried, and tried several...I have then cryo'd my cd collection, a great tweak, highly recommended....then purchased an audiodesk....The improvement is well worth the investment. It is NOT subtle. You will press play and in seconds...you will hear an obvious improvement in soundstage openness, depth, its quieter and cleaner, smoother.. more resolution. Well worth it.