VPI ADS Versus SDS


Gents:

Has anyone "upgraded" from the SDS to the ADS? I've had a two VPI tables over the past decade and have always thought about but never tried one of their speed controllers. I'd be interested in hearing from folks who have used both models and can share comparisons. I've noticed that despite the introduction of the ADS there has not been a significant price drop of the SDS on the used market, which leads me to wonder whether the ADS offers a significant increase in performance. Also, I had heard that VPI was going to launch several ADS models but it seems there is only one currently available. Anyone know about plans for other cheaper or more expensive versions?

In general, what can you expect when you add a speed controller (either model) to your analogue playback system?

Thanks!
dodgealum

Showing 3 responses by melm

A movement from an SDS to an ADS is not an "upgrade." They both are designed to do about the same thing and with the same level of quality. Unfortunately the ADS has been found by many users to be noisy, that is, to produce a vibration that can be heard if it is near the listening position. Best guess offered over on the VPI site is that VPI has used a very cheap transformer inside that simply vibrates. Seems that it needed, but did not get, a redesign upon its launch. That’s why many people are looking for SDSs and the used price is holding up.

Too bad no one has picked up on the Falcon/Eagle/Roadrunner designs.
IIRC those pages are written by Bill Carlin who designed and used to manufacture the Falcon/Eagle/Roadrunner.
The controllers clean up or reconstruct the AC signal, regulate it as to frequency and lower the voltage.  My experience is that they provide a degree of improvement and clarity to the sound much as does the addition of a flywheel or a heavier platter (providing more flywheel).  If you have a revealing system and a discerning listener, the improvements are obvious.

Having said all that, the speed of a belt driven TT may still drift from 33 1/3 because of aging bearing lubricant, an aging belt and/or needle drag.  Other factors?  Hence, many users welcomed the Roadrunner tachometer which measured average platter speed over a period of about 3 revolutions.  When brilliantly mated to the electronic drive as was done with the Falcon and later the Eagle, the frequency would be adjusted slowly, but quickly enough as to be done right and not noticed by the listener.   It is a "set it and forget it" system.  (This differs from the instantaneous correction, as in Asian direct drives with relatively light platters, which, according to many people results in a deterioration of the sound.)

IMO nothing has approached the Roadrunner-Falcon/Eagle system which, unfortunately, is no longer available, and not even on the used market--for no one is parting with them.  And just for the record, these were sold at a much lower total price than the competing VPI systems and IMO were built to a much higher engineering and physical standard.  VPI has literally spent years trying to come up with something comparable, but with no apparent success.

As for this new Australian device noted above, despite the pretty page filled with hype, very little information is actually given regarding its actual use, particularly about its "tacho" or "strobe" system, nor about any incremental cost for them.