My first thought is -Don't do it.
My second is to contact Vandersteen. Mr. V. will probably answer you the next day.
Bob
Vandersteens-- Removing M5-HPs for a Digital Xover?
Hi. Quick survey of people that have removed the M5-HP when using a processor/preamp that can do the Xover internally and how much of a sonic difference there was. I guess there is just something comforting about having the physical Xover in-line when the manual (I have Quatros) talks of all the driver damage that will occur if they are used without a Xover. I just upgraded my pre/pro to a Theta Casablanca that can do it internally. I would assume that there would be some kind of difference due to eliminating the parts inside the M5 and the electric change of having dissimilar metals between my interconnects and the pigtails of the M5s. I know that hearing it is the only proof but wanted to see others’ opinions. Thanks.
Showing 3 responses by gdnrbob
@jwseitz , Mr. V. isn't a big fan of digital, at the moment, though I am. That being said, I would take Mr. V's advice, as he knows what sounds best. But, if you want to try using digital crossover, and have it set up properly- Why not give it a go? Bob |
I would be hesitant to challenge Johnny's take on this.
As I said in my earlier post, Mr. V. has considered using a digital crossover, but found it to be lacking. Johnny, attempted to explain why. You can doubt
But, if the designer himself finds it not up to snuff, then I would take it as gospel. As, I think, Mr. V. would say, you have to listen closely to see if those 'improvements' are what they seem to be. I won't claim to be able to hear this, but I will put my faith in the hearing of those I respect. Bob
|