2. amps-preamps
  3. 1038013118

Upgrading VTL 2.5 pre-amp to: CAT, BAT, or ARC?

I've been thinking about upgrading from my VTL 2.5 TL pre-amp for a long time. My latest (used) choices are: CAT Sig. (Ultimate if possible), ARC LS25 MKII (or LS5, if possible), or BAT (probably VK5i). Other choices might be Hoveland, Joule Electra, or Rogue 99. Besides great sound, my priorities are: build quality, resale, & convenience features. I listen to about 20% vinyl, so a built-in phono pre would be nice, but I'm resigned to getting an outboard one if I buy an ARC for instance. Remote is nice too, but I could live w/o if I get a CAT or Hoveland.

The ARC LS25 MKII is at the top of my list.......partly because I own a VT100 MKII, & it's the best amp I've ever owned. I'm impressed by the build quality & looks. An LS25 almost seems like a no brainer. I know it would be big bucks once I bought a used PH-whatever in addition.

The CAT, I've always heard great things about, & it would be nice to have a high quality built in phono stage. BAT, I've only read good things about. Did the VK5 come with remote &/or phono stage? Hoveland, well I just thought I'd add it to the list. I know there's a lot of nice pre-amps out there & probably others I should consider. And the VTL 2.5 sounds excellent imo (except the phono stage is very noisy), but I just have an urge to try something different.

Rest of my system is: ARC VT100 MKII, Fanfare tuner, Cary 303/200 CD (alternating with CAL CL-25), Rega P25/Benz Glider, and B&W M802 SIII's (alternating with Merlin TSM-M's). Thanks in advance for any advice!
steveaudio

Showing 1 response by gs5556

gs5556
1,243 posts
 
I have owned ARC preamps and currently have the CAT SL-1 Signature. IMO, the CAT is superior in terms of presenting the sound stage, the space around performers and in overall resolution. Even though it's tubed, it does not have what you would call "tube" sound - the entire audio spectrum is presented with pinpoint accuracy without coloration or emphasis on or at a particular area. For opera and classical music, it's practically a must.
The ARC preamps were, to me, excellent sounding with slightly more punch and definition in the bass - I absolutely loved my LS2B MKIII - however the CAT is (to me) preferrable in many respects. In tonal balance, and musicality, I found both ARC and CAT's are very similar. Since you have the VT100's, you may very well prefer ARC for the sound and synergy ARC equipment has with each other.
But if you are considering a CAT, many have called it one of the best preamps you can buy at any price - and you can upgrade around it with practically anything on the market. Just keep in mind that CAT's are single ended; probably the biggest reason why they are not as prevalent for a product of this caliber. Of course, this is MHO from the standpoint of my system, room and music preferences.
More to discover