two way or three way speakers


SF, Franco Serblin says the center speaker only complicates things and he prefers the simple two channel speaker. would the same theory apply to two and three way speakers? I guess what Im asking; is the Cremona elipsa a better speaker musicaly than the auditor with a sub woofer. Do additional crossovers complicate things? I'm just trying to learn so I'll be happy with what I buy. I lean towards the Auditors because of size. I plan on using a Denon 3808ci AVR for starters and prefer lighter music over the heavy stuf.
Thanks, Newby Bob
tensnet

Showing 1 response by markphd

I'd second what Shadorne said. If it's not implemented properly, then the more variables you introduce, the greater that something will mess things up. As a matter of practicality though, more speakers may be needed in a room with a lot of people.

If your L and R speakers are set up properly, and you're sitting in the right spot, you don't need a centre speaker. There should be a stereo image of somebody speaking in between the L and R speakers. That's what a stereo does in the first place and why two speakers are used, i.e. to produce a "stereo" image and a soundstage. Otherwise, just use a single speaker in mono.

Also, if you have large full range speakers with deep bass response, you don't need a sub.

By the way, two-way and three-way speakers, as in your thread title, is not the same thing as using two or three speakers.