The story about the ''strawman''. The German have this curious
saying: ''there is nothing more simple than to refute a philosopher;
one only need to read some other''. The case is that philosopher
produce a strawman from their opponents and then beat him to
death.
The ''things'' which can be true or false are statements (propositions,
sentences, etc). But even atmasphere who give me the lessons
about quantifiers stated : ''I don't believe you''. He deed not quote
any of my statements in particular so, obviously , I am a person
who has the property of being always wrong. This would include all
statements which I ever made.
The other participants in this thread also forget to quote any of
my statement but assumed that my Triplanar is defective ?
Why? I assume because my sample can't track anything above
50 microns. However I wrote that 50 micron is sufficient for ''normal
records'' but that I was surprised that my sample was not able to
track more than 50 microns. This however does not imply that
my Triplanar is defective. If other samples also skip out the groove
by 60 microns this should mean that Triplanar has this ''property''
in general. There are low complience carts which can't track more
than 50 microns by their design but nobody would qualify them
as defective. No tonarm whatever can get 60 microns out of
such a cart. My FR-64 was not able to track 90 microns by any
cart even the Windefeld which claim 100 microns.
So what other deed is ascribing to me things which I never stated
which is the same as producing a strawman.
