Transports not important any longer?


Hello all,

As serious readers of the forum may remember, I just purchased an SFD-MKIII and DSD upsampler. I'm already finding the music to be a major improvement over my old Arcam FMJ. Another league to be honest.

Anyway, I spoke with Chris - the original founder of Sonic Frontiers (now at www.partsconnexion.com) and he said that my DVP-9000ES DVD/SACD should be a perfectly fine transport, and that though AES/EBU would be nice, it really is no longer necessary.

His reasonsing is that the SP/DIF stream is reclocked when it is upsampled in the D2D and then passed on to the DAC via the I2SE cable - and jitter drops to an astoundingly low .4ps. And jitter is not reintroduced from the upsampler to the DAC because of the clock comes to the via the I2SE.

I found this discussion quite interesting, but would love to hear other comments. To be quite honest, the sound coming out of my 9000ES->DSD->SF SFD-MKIII is astounding.

Nonetheless, like all audio-obsessed types, I wonder..

I assume this applies to the Perpetual Technologies DACs, etc.. anything which connects the upsampler to the DAC with a jitter-free connection (firewire, I2SE, and I assume I2S).

Just curious,
Adam
akimball

Showing 1 response by zaikesman

As has been pointed out before, Theta, the originators of separate transports/DAC's for CD, no longer manufacture a CD-based transport - their current models all utilize DVD-based mechanisms, and they feel that these are better even for Redbook CD playback. I don't know if I would go so far as to say that transports aren't important any longer, though. I don't have a high bit-rate, upsampling, or DVD transport-based digital playback system, but I have heard too many differences among transports, even with a reclocking jitter-reduction device in the chain, to believe that the issue has become irrelevent without some sort of comparative proof.