TIDAL Master Quality


Who are 99% of remastered tracks on tidal so annoying both as a listening and sound stage experience.
What exactly is the point.?
Some tracks I actually don't even recognize the original production.

Thank god for vinyl.

J.
jpmusic

Showing 3 responses by shadorne

 Masters on Tidal are MQA. They sound slightly worse than anything else except perhaps MP3. Regular CD quality is better than MQA.
@rbstehno


I find non-MQA has less distortion on both Benchmark and Directstream Sr DACs than MQA. MQA doesn’t image quite as well due to the added distortion from the minimum phase filter. The apodizing filter adds some audio compression which while pleasant to many ears, it is simply less faithful to the original than other formats.

You can hear the imaging issues on most tracks but the audio compression is very slight and almost imperceptible unless you know what to listen for. (It changes the timbre of transients)
@rbstehno 


 It is ok to disagree. I hear the difference the from the added distortion from MQA but I can understand many folks may like it.