Tidal digital hi-fi vs records


Played remastered album on Tidal Hi-fi, and then played the remastered vinyl version.
No comparison. None. Tidal was DOA. No life. 
I then played the original Harvest album. It was a little "dirtier" than the remastered record as you can imagine but -head shaking- it was three dimensional, in the room and so much more dynamic.
Drum sticks sounded like they were made of wood. Tamborine had color. Ah dammit. It was just better by an order of magnitude that it made both the remastered efforts pointless.
128x128noromance

Showing 1 response by williewonka

A few years ago I purchase a Behringer UCA222 - a little A/D converyer 
- Cost $35
- Converts analogue to 16/44.
- recorded content sounds amazing

https://www.amazon.ca/Behringer-UCA222-Ultra-Low-Latency-Interface/dp/B0023BYDHK

I've recorded a few albums, just to see if I could hear a difference between my Analogue side and digital side, because I had compared analogue versions to CD's and found the same as Lowrider57 - the mastering of different sources are always tweaked a little differently.

Using this simple little A/D converter I was able to eliminate those mastering "refinements" from the equation because my "master" was the analogue version.

I was amazed at just how good my digital side performs - i.e. I had to listen really intently to discern any differences bewteen the analogue version or recorded digital version - and that's conducting A/B listening simply by switching inputs.

So now I am confident that my digital rig is aproaching the sound quality of my analogue rig and I attribute any noticeable differences to
- the mastering techniques applied to a recording or
- the data rate at which a song is broadcast.

With those two things in the mix it is pretty pointless in comparing the two different formats.

So now I just listen to the music and enjoy

Regards  Steve