2. digital
  3. 160424-115562

Thinking about getting a R2R DAC

Dear community,

I currently have a chord qutest DAC. I like it a lot, very full sound, accurate detailed and exciting.  However, whenever I go back to vinyl (with a well-recorded nice pressing) I find the sound so much more satisfying.  There is a warmth, yes, but there is a presence, a 'there-ness' that I just don't get with the digital.  I'm wondering if an R2R DAC would get me closer to that?  my budget would be around the same as the qutest.  I was looking at the MHDT Orchid or the Border Patrol.  Don't get me wrong, I really like the Qutest.  I am thinking of putting it in the upstairs system to pair with the Node2i I have up there.  Any thoughts?  Will analog always just be a different animal than digital?

Currently in the main system I have a Sonore uRendu feeding the Qutest which is going to a LTA MZ2 going to a Pass XA 30.5

thanks!
adam8179

Showing 1 response by teo_audio

teo_audio
2,197 posts
 
djones513,040 posts09-29-2020 3:48pmEQ would work as well as an R2R DAC, perhaps better at trying to mimic vinyl.
Sorry, that’s not how it works. It has nothing to do with equalization. It has to do with micro and macro inter transient timing and placement in the singular and complex whole.

Which is where the R-2-R dac type excels and the delta-sigma types fall flat on their face.

tubes have it
LP’s have it
Speakers have it. (not as perfect, but it is intrinsically in there)
Reel to Reel tape has it (IF the electronics are tubed--even better!)
Tube based cutter heads have it (Doug Sax’s set up)
V-Fet and SIT transistors have it 

List of things that don’t have it:
All known FET, MOSFET and BJT transistor based designs of any type or nature.
As in all class D amps, all BJT based solid state amps, all DACS, and so on. anything solid state.

The R-2-R Dac type has enough of it that it seems more believable and real to the ear.
More to discover