Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant

marqmike

Nice score! on the B.A.T VK 250.  Good to read that you like the VK 250 / CS 2.4 combo. What other gear and cabling rounds out your System?

 

Happy Listening!

devin - Replacing like with like components is certainly the safest. Many folks underestimate the intricate co-dependence of all the elements. Even layout changes affect the subtle outcomes. Keeping values at original levels is a good start, but various parasitics also matter. The frequency response is rarely changed in significant ways; but time/phase generally is.

You may remember the maddening months to years delays between Thiel product announcements, or even live displays, and their actual release. Most of that time was tweaking, mostly in realms more subtle than most designers would pay attention to.

In our DIY / rework world, the largest trap that I’ve found is subbing foil for the original wire inductors. Foil is indeed a more pure inductor, but its parasitics are so different from wire that considerable xo tweaks would be required to re-settle the circuits.

The safest bet is subbing in Mills MRA resistors for Thiel stock. Another safe and surprisingly effective tweak is replacing any electrolytic cap with 2 x half-value cap. The ESR and other anomalies are reduced by half, plus if you turn one cap backwards, end for end, other anomalies are cancelled. If there is a bypass cap (like Thiel’s yellow 1uF), that can be stacked to make a triangle for a single field.

Replacing caps, especially larger values is quite costly and sometimes demands circuit tweaks. It’s not hard to throw as much cost into upgrades as the entire production budget of the original speaker. Not for the faint of heart.

TT

Another safe and surprisingly effective tweak is replacing any electrolytic cap with 2 x half-value caps. The ESR and other anomalies are reduced by half, plus if you turn one cap backwards, end for end, other anomalies are cancelled.

tomthiel

Interesting, I think this is the first time I hear this. To make sure I understand, you are recommending replacing, say, one 100uF bipolar with two // 50uF bipolars, correct? So, when you say "turn one cap backwards" do you mean just physically, as in making sure the writings on the caps run in opposite directions? Since both caps are non-polarized anyway.

As far as cancelling anomalies, is that because bipolar caps are internally non-symmetrical?

I had to // caps in my rebuild because original values were unavailable. The pairs are not equal in value, but close enough that hopefully the smaller ones don't act as bypass. Also, I never thought of swapping ends because I hadn't read this post yet smiley

Thank you again for sharing your knowledge.

devinplombier

Out of curiosity what capacitor values were not available, and what manufacture capacitors are you using ?