The Shure V15 V with a Jico SAS/B stylus VS The Soundsmith Hyperion MR and Lyra Atlas SL


On a sentimental lark I purchased two Shure V15 V bodies and one SAS/B stylus. I was always a realistic about the Shure's potential. Was comparing it to $10k+ cartridges fair? Absolutely. The Shure was considered to be one of the best cartridges of the day. Why not compare it to a few of the best we have today?

The Shure has always been considered to be unfailingly neutral. Famous recording engineers have said it sounded most like their master tapes. I do not have an original stylus for the Shure and I can not say that the Jico performs as well. 

My initial evaluation was quite positive. It worked wonderfully well in the Shroder CB. With a light mounting plate and small counterbalance weight a resonance point of 8 hz was easily achieved. There was nothing blatantly wrong with the sound. There was no mistracking at 1.2 grams. You can see pictures of all these styluses here https://imgur.com/gallery/stylus-photomicrographs-51n5VF9 

After listening to a bunch of favorite evaluation records my impression was that the Shure sounded on the thin side, lacking in the utmost dynamic impact with just a touch of harshness. I listened to the Shure only for four weeks as my MC phono stage had taken a trip back to the factory. I was using the MM phono stage in the DEQX Pre 8, designed by Dynavector. I have used it with a step up transformer and know it performs well. I got my MC stage back last week and cycled through my other cartridges then back to the Shure. The Soundsmith and Lyra are much more alike than different. I could easily not be able to tell which one was playing. The Lyra is the slightest touch darker. The Shure is a great value....for $480 in today's money, but it can not hold a candle to the other cartridges. They are more dynamic, smoother and quieter. They are more like my high resolution digital files. Whether or not they are $10,000 better is a personal issue. Did the DEQX's phono stage contribute to this lopsided result? Only to a small degree if any. I do have two Shure bodies and they both sound exactly the same. The Shure may have done better with a stock stylus. I do not think the age of the bodies contributes to this result at all. 

128x128mijostyn

You listen to "modern electronic music"? Just kidding.

If I lived in rural New Hampshire, I would have a Ducati for sure.

@richardbrand What is a pseudo line source? Do you have stadium concerts down under? If you go to one you can hear midrange/bass line sources. The sound is usually awful. I do not bother any more. 

The problem with most "line source" speakers is that the line source behavior is limited to certain frequencies depending on the design of the speaker. Very few people have a line source system capable of maintaining that behavior below 200 Hz. This is the big reason these speakers tend to lack really punching bass. Point source speakers lose acoustic power by the cube of the distance away from the speaker, but line sources only at the square of the distance. As you move away from the speaker bass frequencies fall off much faster leaving an anemic sound. Full range line source systems have advantages. The sound stage you get is right up from within the first 10 rows. Point source systems are back in the 25th row. Bass and percussion are much more life like in terms of power and dynamics. The problem for most people is the size of the system, it owns the room.

You do not need a distributor. Sound Labs will ship anywhere in the world that allows it. God knows what the duties are like down there. The Aussies make some great equipment. My DEQX preamp is Australian. There are many speaker manufacturers. Nobody makes ESLs? 

I have zapped myself on numerous occasions usually from forgetting to ground out the diaphragm before working on the speaker. That is a bigger zap than what you get from the bias supply directly. It is not capable of much current. The stators are referenced to ground, they discharge immediately when the music stops. 

@lewm Vermont also has great riding, but New Hampshire rules with the Harley crowd because you do not have to wear a helmet here. They think that putting along at 30 MPH means you can't get your head squished by a run away truck or a WOMAN in an SUV on her f-ing cell phone. I emphasized the female gender to make sure everyone knew I was talking about an XX, not an XY masquerading as an XX.  This is particularly true of XXs driving Jeeps. My helmet is fluorescent yellow and it scares the h-ll out of many drivers. They move over even if they are not in my lane, Brilliant. We now have airbag vests. When the vest detects an unusual acceleration in the wrong direction it fires off the airbags and you go bouncing down the road or off other vehicles until the bags deflate. I don't use them too uncomfortable. I would use them for racing, but I do not do that any more in the strictest sense. 

I do own a Ducati, but in this case I was referring to my Triumph Thruxton RS. There are times when the British hit the nail squarely on the head like the Jag XKE and the Thruxton RS. The Ducati is raucous and in your face, but the Thruxton is just a beautiful thing, visually and mechanically. 

@mijostyn 

I do know and understand that stuff, pretty much like the back of my hand.  Absolutely right, subwoofers should be put to work on long wavelengths, which often will be longer than the listening room.  They will excite room resonances and one benefit of having multiple subs is that they average out these resonances a bit.

Now are you saying that the longest distance between any two of your subs is four feet?  I am particularly familiar with the Duntech Sovereign where the blurb says it is "acknowledged by experts as the finest speaker in the world, certainly the most accurate".  Each speaker has seven drivers in a floor to ceiling D'Appolito arrangement, which puts 12" bass drivers near the floor and ceiling.  Base is quoted as down to 27-Hz within 2-dB.  A huge amount of effort was put into time aligning the seven drivers so if you sat at the right ear height, phase differences were less than 25 degrees.

Because time alignment is so important, vertical listening position was crucial.  Slowly lower yourself and suddenly a huge image came into focus.  A few inches more and it was gone.  That was in a very large demonstration room where wall reflections mattered less than usual.  I've mentioned before that the reference used when designing these speakers was the Quad ESL-63.

Yep, the wavelengths tweeters should handle make it unwise to use more than one (why does Infinity spring to mind here?).  Tweeters can be made coincident (concentric) with mid-range drivers, as was done by Tannoy and is now brilliantly executed by KEF.  I have not heard the Tannoy re-incarnation by Fyne.

I made reference to the HD-3P Tweeter when being in discussion about the ESL 57, and my intention to attempt to tidy up one of it's obvious shortcomings with the Tweeter. Under the guise of "Hearing is Believing", I made more known about my experiences with Speakers using this Tweeter. 

Referencing the Driver was not a prompt to encourage the use of it, even though that is a consideration I do recommend.

To see that the Tweeters Data is now sought out and added as a further information was not expected to be seen within this Thread. Maybe in a Thread dedicated to the Tweeter as can be discovered on other forums. 

To the on-looker who has an interest in Self Produced Speakers, the added info might be enough to convince the Tweeter is worth a further investigation and worthy of such  contemplation.