The Science of Cables


It seems to me that there is too little scientific, objective evidence for why cables sound the way they do. When I see discussions on cables, physical attributes are discussed; things like shielding, gauge, material, geometry, etc. and rarely are things like resistance, impedance, inductance, capacitance, etc. Why is this? Why aren’t cables discussed in terms of physical measurements very often?

Seems to me like that would increase the customer base. I know several “objectivist” that won’t accept any of your claims unless you have measurements and blind tests. If there were measurements that correlated to what you hear, I think more people would be interested in cables. 

I know cables are often system dependent but there are still many generalizations that can be made.
128x128mkgus
bo1972
Audio is a shootout.
A "shootout" is the worst way to choose an audio component. It takes time to evaluate an audio component's strengths and weaknesses.
You have no F. clue what the properties are of each part in your system.
Really? Please tell me what you know about my system and me.
Post removed 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericmack/2018/03/09/carbon-nanotube-membrane-breakthrough-is-real-world...

The link I provided earlier at Forbes magazine, was cut by Forbes.

Some corporations do that. why would they break links when it brings readers to their website? Odd, but they do it all the time.

Although, I find it happens a lot with cutting edge technological revelations.

And yes, bulk material transmutation of elements is now (openly) possible, a very hot area of research, it is. (see my prior post and do the legwork...find it....)

If it’s strength you’re looking for graphene is 100 times stronger than steel. And much more conductive than copper. Get with the program!