skiroe, The poly drivers you speak of were all the rage for a short period of time. I remember auditioning speakers with such drivers and they seemed to have a "plasticy" sound to them. Paul Mc was making the point that in his experience, regardless of driver material, as long as the speaker designer understood the limitations of the drivers and utilized them within their optimum frequency level that all would be good.
This seemed to me to be appropo to the Tektons as they appear to use very conventional paper cones for the midrange and bass. Paul's opinion would seem to support the claim of Tekton devotees as to the superb sound quality of their speakers.
I have personally gone the other way, buying into the efficacy of very sophisticated tight tolerance drivers uniting with an excellently executed crossover to deliver outstanding sound.
Which approach is "right"? Maybe neither or both. I would love to have the opportunity to hear the Double Impacts of similar Tekton model to hear where they truly fall, at least to my ears, in the pantheon of audiophile speakers.
This seemed to me to be appropo to the Tektons as they appear to use very conventional paper cones for the midrange and bass. Paul's opinion would seem to support the claim of Tekton devotees as to the superb sound quality of their speakers.
I have personally gone the other way, buying into the efficacy of very sophisticated tight tolerance drivers uniting with an excellently executed crossover to deliver outstanding sound.
Which approach is "right"? Maybe neither or both. I would love to have the opportunity to hear the Double Impacts of similar Tekton model to hear where they truly fall, at least to my ears, in the pantheon of audiophile speakers.