Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli

Showing 2 responses by jaytor

@hiendmmoe - I also have to disagree with your basic premise. I have not heard these speakers myself, but I'm not willing to dismiss them based on the cost of the drivers.

While I agree that, in most cases, a higher priced driver is likely to have lower distortion at a given SPL, the fact that Tekton tends to use a lot more drivers than is typical can easily overcome this disadvantage.

In my experience, transducer distortion is non-linear with power, meaning the distortion goes up faster than the SPL as a driver is pushed harder. So even if a given driver is not as "good" as a high-priced speaker driver, the multiple high-efficiency drivers are working a lot less hard in the Tekton (particularly the multi-driver array used for the midrange) and therefore are likely to be able to deliver a higher level of performance than a speaker with a much smaller number of somewhat better drivers.

From everything I've read and heard about these speakers (particularly the DI and Moab), these speakers deliver an excellent sound quality level for the dollar and are comparable SQ-wise with speakers that cost considerably more. 

Even without hearing them, I believe this could easily be the case based on their design.  A large cabinet with lots of drivers can overcome a lot of limitations from the modest quality drivers. 

The other thing to take into account is that Tekton is a direct-to-consumer business. While this doesn't completely eliminate the costs of the "middle-man" since Tekton has to handle the customer issues directly, it does mean there is one less business in the middle that has to earn a profit. 

If I wasn't happy with my DIY GR-Research open-baffle speakers, I would definitely be looking seriously at the Tekton speakers (particularly the DI and Moab). 


I've read through (or at least scanned) this entire thread over the past month and I'm pretty intrigued by these speakers (or perhaps the Moabs).

One area that I don't recall being discussed much is how directional these speakers are. Steve Lefkowicz's review on positive-feedback.com mentions that these speakers are highly directional implying limited off-axis response (at least in the midrange). This doesn't seem to jive with the Stereophile measurements of the Impact Monitors. 

I realize that every speaker is going to sound it's best in the ideal seating position (and from what I've read, the DIs are pretty stellar in this regard), but is it possible to get respectable imaging for two or three listeners sitting on a sofa?

I'd be using these in a fairly large room (about 19' x 27' x 8'), so distance to the speakers could be 12' or so.

Thanks.