Tekton Design Enzo 2.7 or Lore? Help me decide.


I've been eyeballing the Tekton speakers for a while now and seem to be gravitating toward the Enzo 2.7. Originally, I thought about the Lore, but I'm cautious with metal dome tweeters, as some I've heard are too bright for my tastes. I have no direct experience with the Audex Gold in the Lore, and it's possible that it's not overly bright. But on the other hand I like the idea of the tweeter array in the Enzo. I don't have enough space for their bigger models.

In general, everything I've read about Tekton appeals to me, ie strong bass, neutral mids and highs with fast transients and dynamics, although with high sensitivity, I hope my electronics are quiet enough.

I like to hear from anyone with experience with Tekton speakers, especially Enzo 2.7 and Lore. Thanks.

PrimaLuna Prologue 2
Hegel H80
Elekit 8200
Denefrips Ares 2 DAC
dtapo
I bought the Tekton double impact monitors a year ago and paired them with my Peachtree Nova 300.
Match made in heaven, these speakers are incredibly detailed and very muscular at the same time, from classic guitar to AC/DC they do it all without listener fatigue and an incredibly deep soundstage. Fat bass and midrange. Probably the best and last system I will ever buy.
I've had the factory-upgraded Double Impact's for a few months now. Chosen for their linear full-range response, 99dB efficiency and value. Some of the best speakers I've had in rotation, with many attributes to praise.

Negatives are size, weight, potential spouse-approval issues, and they sound like listening to speakers - where open-baffle/no-baffle designs (think Spatial, Pure Audio Project, Kii, Linkwitz, GR Research, etc.) sound like listening live first-person.

LXmini puts you on-stage/in-studio, hearing instruments/voices directly. Tekton takes you off the stage, into the front row/mixing room, where you hear the music through mic's, amps, and very good speakers.

DI's have more forward highs (than I'm accustomed to), which de-emphasizes mids (aren't as warm as I like). I've heard (from others) Lore's are more balanced in this regard, with warmer mids. For me, that issue was remedied in minutes with one slight DSP adjustment. But I spent much more time DSP tweaking to make LXmini's voice-matched to the Tektons - kudos to Tekton. (Linkwitz purists gasp!)

Enzo or Lore... I too have an aversion to overly bright tweeters (B&W - please not again!). That coupled with the hideous look of those gold tweeters would make the decision easy for me. But I haven't heard either of them, so can't comment on their sound - the most important aspect.

Get whichever offers fullest range and most linear response and a DSP, then voice them however you like. My Martin Logan electrostats used to have rolled-off highs - now they don't.
@dtapo hi, if you are not in the tekton facebook group yet, I suggest you join this group to get more feedback from Tekton owners 

I owned the Lore for five years and during that time owned three different preamps and two different amplifiers.  On a brightness scale of 1-10 with 5 being about perfect and 10 being very, very bright...I would rate it at about a 7.
It is very sensitive to electronics, to rooms and to toe in/out.  The best things about it are very good detail, punchy low end and big soundstage. The two weaknesses in my room was every now and then, there was sibilance that I could not tame and a relatively small sweet spot. 

I'd say that with your electronics, if your room is big enough that you can allow them to breathe and not be close to the side walls, you can get a lot of enjoyment from the Lores.
And one more thing...when the time comes to resell them, they hold their value pretty well and you don't eat a ton of money when it comes to shipping.
As for the Enzo 2.7...just my guess, they will sound better overall.
Thanks for the input. I joined the Tekton facebook group and I'll post what I decide.