TAD-60 vs Prima Luna


Has anyone heard both? They both have alot of buzz, does the extra power, pent/triode switch, feedback ajustablity win out over autobias? I guess the most direct comparison would be the prologue 4 amp vs the TAD-60 but any comparison with a prima luna product would be helpful.
128x128perkadin

Showing 2 responses by bionuclear

I have tried both TA-30 & TAD-60 side by side. The 60 offers depth and imagery detail in the midrange. Instruments at the right time seem to step forward & jump out - where the 30 sounds less enjoyable, more sedate. Bass is 2X stronger on the 60. Driving both with a TAD-150 is a plus - instrument placement and clarity much improved. Overall very pleased with what I heard. Sold my TA-30, not missed at all. No unusual tube problems with the 60. Audio power comes from the B+ power supply. EL-34's are very strong tubes - much more reliable than 6550 or KT-88. Traveling Randy
The Cayin-Prima Luna actually is a hybrid solid state/tube design. Lower distortion at higher power is derived from the fact the amp has transistorized active feedback, two very bad words when you're talking tube amps. The active feedback also is the same circuit that auto adjusts the bias without music playing, a smart design till you hear a Cayin TA-30 that is 100% exactly the same amp except for the no no transistor feedback. Now I hear many TA-30 owners are trading up to the new TAD-60. Side by side the 60 smokes the Cayin. I'd give the TAD-60 a try - since you can check one out without a restocking fee for 2 weeks. To me simplicity is what makes a good tube amp design. The TAD amp really is built 1960's style inside & out. Should last a few lifetimes - not like the Prima-Luna - where you gonna get that bias IC when it blows in 15 years? Traveling Randy from S. Africa