Synergistic New Tesla Line...Any comments?

How does the older A/C Master Coupler stack up to the new T3? Anyone heard both?

How does the T2 compare with the T3 on a pre/CDP?

Anyone compared the Accelerator speaker cables to the Acoustic Reference? Would be used with Magnepan 3.6´s. Heard that the Accelerator is their best value by far.

Is the Transporter an upgraded Quattro?

Do you know the price for the new Galileo MPC?

Pics of the new Galileo products here

...and here

I tried both the PR and Accelerator in this position and in my system preferred the Accelerator

Is there a bigger difference between the (PR and Acc) speaker cables than the IC´s?

Thanks, I get the impression that the PR IC can sometimes be a bit too revealing and analytical, is the same true for the speaker cables?

the Accel and PR speaker cables are VERY different from each other. I preferred the PR speaker cables in my system.

In what way was PR better than Acc? I am currently using an Accelerator XLR between my CDP (with built in pre) and amp.

Sorry joey if I was unclear. I am happy with my Accelerator IC and have no plans on upgrading but was wondering IN WHAT WAY the PR and Acc SPEAKER cables are different.

Thanks again for the input, much appreciated.

What is the difference between the standard version and the T3SE?

"My point is that until you actually hear something in your own system, you need to take words like "better" and "dramatic improvement" with a big grain of salt. Both Elliot at Synergistic and John at the Cable Company were kind enough to allow me to demo these cables in my system. I went with the balanced Prec Ref cables (old style without those bullets), not because of the dollars, but because of the sound."

Wise words Fplanner

Hifinut, which of the Element IC´s did you prefer, the Copper or Tungsten? I am curious if both would be an upgrade over my current Accelerator or just a lateral move.....