Swiss Digital Fuse Box - "What headroom sounds like"


Swiss Digital Fuse Box (SDFB) is non-sacrificial overcurrent protection device that serves as a replacement for fuses in audio equipment.

There are four devices in my sound system that I’ve replaced fuses with the SDFB, and its transformative capacity to upgrade sound quality beyond that of fuses has compelled me to write a review. I’m not associated with Verafi Audio, the company that sells them, nor did I receive anything from them as "review units". There’s another thread on Audiogon about them that an audiophile friend referred me to, which got me interested enough to buy them. I am now enamored with the sound of my system in its current state, so I wanted to share my take on one of the more significant steps in how I arrived here.

Before getting into details about its form and function, I want to share my impression of what the Swiss Digital Fuse Box (SDFB) does for sound quality. It makes my components sound like they are operating without any limitation of power. It sounds open and unrestricted across the audio frequency spectrum. The sound is dynamic, detailed, defined, and there a sense of harmony and completeness about it. It’s like my components can now output their full frequency and harmonic potential.

A few things about me... I’m more of an artist than anything. I’ve been a music lover for 35 years and an electric bass player for 15 of those years playing in two bands, with which I was the bass player on one full LP recording and one EP. I’ve recorded, mixed and mastered my own multi-layered solo bass recordings and their backing tracks from sampled percussion using digital audio workstation software. I’ve also fine-tuned two of my custom car audio systems using DSP software and built, tweaked, and tuned a high end home stereo system (yes I said *tuned*, without using DSP) . Given this experience and the resultant development of a keenly perceptive and informed "ear", yet having no formal electrical theory or engineering background, I feel comfortable suggesting that the results of using SDFB can be likened to how audio sounds when the device producing it is operating with ample headroom. What does headroom sound like? The term headroom has different meanings in its use within pro audio recording/engineering and electrical circuitry operation, but they are related in a way that the end result sounds uncompressed, undistorted, fully dynamic, and expresses the sense of the effortlessness of unrestricted flow.

Does this sound like embellishment? It probably does. And I haven’t even mentioned the typical audiophile terms like "inner detail", "layering", or "rock solid imaging", nor have I even mentioned soundstaging attributes yet -- even though all of these qualities have also gone through upgrades due to the SDFB’s being installed. Am I merely in an irrational, excited state because my whole system now sounds much more expensive than it is? I don’t think so. I’ve been using all four SDFB units for three weeks consistently, and the initial excitement phase I was experiencing settled at least a week ago. I also think that the more components a system has which have replaceable fuses, the greater the potential upgrade from replacing each of those fuses with SDFBs. Like I said, I replaced all fuses in four of my audio components (six fuses in total), and there were notable step-up improvements in sonics as I progressively installed each of them.

Now I’ll describe the physicality of the device and how to use it. Then, I’ll try to describe specifics about why my previous fuse setup, which was a combination of Synergistic Research Purple and Master fuses, was completely replaced by SDFBs. These SR fuses were already a major upgrade in sound relative to the stock, generic fuses, and the SDFBs transcended the SR fuses in every discernible way.

These things have two separate parts that work together: 1) a small box that is inserted as the middle of a chain created between an audio component and the electrical outlet from which it draws power, and 2) a solid, cylindrical metal slug (referred to as a "Sluggo") which is the same size as the typical fuse. To install a SDFB, first, with your component off, plug its power cable into the AC socket on one end of the box, and on the other end of the box there is a male IEC connector (C14) which you connect to an outlet using another power cable or an adapter. I’m using a combination of two short, homemade mini-cables, and two generic adapters with my four SDFBs for the best sound (details shared in my Audiogon virtual system). Once the box is connected to a live electrical line, it will go through a brief setup period, and after maybe 8-10 seconds, you’ll hear a clicking sound and the small green LED will stay lit, indicating that charge is now allowed to flow through the box. The second and final step, with the component still off, is to replace the fuse(s) with a Sluggo. The device comes with both copper and brass Sluggos. You can then turn the component on. Don’t replace a fuse with a Sluggo without the SDFB in place because you’ll have no overcurrent protection and you’ll incur the risk of severely damaging your component and/or having a catastrophic fire in the even of a short circuit or other overcurrent scenario.

These units monitor current magnetically, and are calibrated to whatever fuse rating is needed when you order them. They are also calibrated to operate as either slow blow, or fast blow, like a normal fuse. When the set parameters are exceeded (too much current), a relay is switched to the closed position and charge is halted from flowing. Being non-sacrificial, you don’t need to buy a new one, you just unplug it from the outlet for about 30 seconds and it will reset the state. Then it can be plugged back in and reused. There’s no damage done to the device due to the overcurrent condition, unlike a fuse which melts due to high heat. Currently, devices being produced are to be calibrated at 10 amps max, so if there is some crazy high current event, perhaps then it could be damaged. I don’t know. I believe that’s pretty unlikely though. I think I remember reading that there’s a 15 amp version in the works.

There is some inconvenience involved with transitioning to SDFB due to the extra weight of the box (not that heavy, really) and extra length added to the power chain, as well as potentially requiring additional investment in more power cables. I feel that I achieved an optimal result for only about $200 of additional investment by using some DYI cable materials I had available, some high quality plugs to terminate the cable with, and some cheapo adapters from Amazon. For me, dealing with the extra weight and length to the cabling and putting in the work to create the best solution for connecting the SDFBs to my power conditioners has not been a big deal compared to the profound jump in sound quality. Totally worth it.

Before I went all SDFBs, the best configuration I found with SR fuses in my system was one small Master fuse in the LPS that powers the modem and router (I have an all-digital streaming system), two small Master fuses in the DAC, one small Purple fuse in the preamplifier, and two large Purple fuses in the amplifier. It’s worth mentioning that total retail cost of this setup is about 33% more expensive than the retail cost of my final SDFB setup. However, if you choose to buy a bunch of new, expensive power cables to connect your SDFBs, that would quickly become more the more expensive option.

I thought the SR setup sounded great at the time. I was impressed with the top end detail that a few of the Master fuses added to the fuller midrange and mid-bass sound of the Purple fuses which I already had. I’ve seen comments from others on this site in agreement about this. This combination is getting some praise. However, when comparing that sound to the SDFB sound, it was like the SR fuses are stuck at a level of trying to boost certain frequency ranges to make up for how restrictive a fuse really essentially sounds.

How do you improve on a small, low resolution, blurry, drab looking photo? Well, you manipulate it in Photoshop, of course! You try to crank up values of various visual (light-based) metrics to make it more attractive. However, that process will never produce something as close to the original subject as when you start with an ultra-high resolution, high-dynamic range photograph. You can’t "add resolution" to something that is intrinsically underpinned to a state of reduced resolution. To me, this is analogous to the task of starting with the tiny, resistive piece of wire in a fuse and trying to add crystals and various substances of specific resonant frequencies inside and around it to end up with something representative of the innate completeness of the source material.

Comparatively speaking, I was surprised to switch back to the SR setup and find that the soundstage was compressed towards the center. It was like there was a somewhat spherical haziness in center stage from which the sound was straining to emanate from, even with the Master fuses in play. I attribute this sense of "haziness" to a combination of reduced dynamic range, and a distortion of the frequency response coming from the system’s components. If the hypothetical ideal response for a natural sound (assuming the important aspects of room acoustics and one’s hearing quality are held constant) is essentially a linear response from top to bottom in both amplitude and purity, then the sound of the SR setup was now perceived as distorted and a deviation from linearity.

The sound of the SDFB setup is far more natural, far more detailed, and imparts a sense of ease while listening. I’m using all copper Sluggos, as their tonality is more natural to me than the brass versions. The soundstage has opened up with more dimensionality and all of that perceived haziness and limitation of full expression is (seemingly) completely gone. Images became more defined and image positioning is on a more advanced level. I can now perceive the two singers positioned near center and side-by-side in the mix, with a gap of about about a head’s-width between their mouths. This wasn’t perceivable with the SR fuses. The positioning of cymbals on a well recorded drumset are precisely locateable in space. Listening to Russion choral music, I can now hear individual tenor and bass voices and their unique tonal qualities. On one excellent recording of a solo harp, there’s beautiful overtones resonating that I’ve never been able to hear before. The sound is descriptively harmonious.

Over the course of a couple weeks, the sound of these units opened up. To begin, there was some minor coloration of the sound, but I’m not sure I can hear it any more. I think most of it has gone away as the units have burned in. Even with the minor coloration in the beginning, the immediate leap above the SR fuses in sound quality was obvious and highly desirable.

One last thing, I did a rough test of the overcurrent protection functionality, as this is obviously a major thing to get right and have working properly. I’ve been told that most refrigerators pull about 1 amp of current, so I used that as a basis for testing since I don’t have any more sophisticated method (I could use my desktop computer PSU which has a wattage display to achieve more accurate testing, but I’d rather not have its power suddenly cut and risk problems). I have two SDFBs calibrated to trip at levels below 1 amp, and two units calibrated at significantly above 1 amp. With each of the two sub-1A units inline with the fridge’s power cable (doing two test rounds for each unit), they immediately tripped and the fridge’s power was disconnected when I plugged in the power chain into the outlet. For the above-1A units (also did two test rounds each), the units did not cut power, and the fridge turned on and operated normally. I feel like this testing demonstrates enough for me to have a boost in confidence in the overcurrent protection operational integrity.

Being able to safely use solid metal slugs in place of fuses is wholly a paradigm shift in a high end audio system’s sound quality potential. These things deserve attention and I’m grateful to have been pointed to them.


https://verafiaudiollc.com

128x128gladmo

Showing 16 responses by ozzy

Because it’s just a copper slug to replace a fuse! By-passing the fuse holder entirely would seem to be the better direction.

ozzy

Well, I applied some of Rick Shultz NPS Pro on the copper slugs. Didn’t seem to do anything.

I think you guys are getting carried away with polishing the slugs. IMHO that is.

ozzy

So, I just purchased some .9999 7-gauge solid silver rods. I may need to solder 2 of them together, but my intention is to use it in place of the copper slug.

ozzy

recklesskelly,

You need to realize that this forum is for audio enthusiasts that consider it a hobby.

These are tweaks! No tweak that I know of has any type of government liability protection.

ozzy

So, I just purchased some .9999 7-gauge solid silver rods. I may need to solder 2 of them together, but my intention is to use it in place of the copper slug.

UPDATE:

I just received the silver rods. First off what a PITA trying to solder these (2) 7-gauge rods together. I used silver solder no less.

Then it became over diameter and would not insert into the tube holder, so I had to grind them until they did fit.

I just installed them, and I will update my impression after some more hours.

ozzy

Update:

The first thing I noticed after inserting the silver rods (slugs) was that my tube bias changed big time and needed to be reset. Interesting.

I would say that after just a few hours of actual running time what I am hearing is definitely a louder and more dynamic sound. The bass goes much deeper, and the treble is more exposed. Words and imaging have improved greatly.

Within the song, In My Life by the Beatles we always thought the words were "eye of Paul", now it is very clear it is Albert Hall. Perhaps at this point the sound is a little too sharp. After all it is pure .9999 solid silver, but I will give it more playing time before passing final judgement.

Today I applied some of Ric Shultz Pro on the slugs ends.

ozzy

Calm down rabble rousers, my bad, my reference is from the song "A Day In The Life" Sgt Pepper. I could make it out before but with the silver slugs in place the words are more clearly defined. I was just trying to explain the added clarity.

Sheesh...

Evidently you guys don’t remember the Paul is dead controversy. Could be memory loss?

ozzy

I don’t know gladmo. I own several AudioQuest Dragon power cords (all silver), and they are the best power cords I have ever tried. But, with my amps I am using copper power cords. I think it is more of balancing the sound.

The system is starting to sound really good. The sharpness is almost all gone away. I think the difference is in the type of silver being used. And, I did coat it with some of Ric Shultz Pro enhancer.

Even at this early point it seems to be better than the copper slug. More to follow.

ozzy

Well, I am not yet convinced the silver is truly an improvement over the copper slug. I need to give it more hours and then change over to the copper.

ozzy

thecarpathian,

I’m going to play it with the silver slug for about a week then switch over to the copper. Plus, Rick says to let the Pro enhancer work for about 400 hours. Seems like alot of time... BTW, I used the same enhancer on the copper slug previously.

I was wonderin’ though, since the power cord is plugged into the wall and the fuse is in line with the power cord, will it break in without the amp being turned on? I guess the answer is no, but it would be helpful since I don’t want to leave my tube amps on 24/7.

ozzy

Update:

I still have the Silver slugs in my amps. Since I am only playing them maybe 4 hours a day it has probably been less than 50 hours total playing time thus far. I’m going to wait until I get closer to 100 hours before moving back to the copper slug.

But at this point, I am very satisfied in the sound quality. The sharpness first exhibited has completely gone away.

ozzy

I changed the IEC in the Fuse Box to a Furutech NCF version. The blades are much thicker. Fairly easy to do.

I also made my own AC jumper(s) cable out of Furutech cable with Furutech NCF AC/IEC fittings. All internal wiring/connections was treated with Ricks Pro enhancer.

And of course, I am still experimenting with the solid .9999 silver slugs.

The only thing I couldn’t upgrade was the AC plug inlet.

ozzy

recklesskelly,

Yes, everything matters. (sometimes). Its only as good as the weakest link...

Rick from the High-Fidelity Cable era is still making a product called "Pro" which he claims is far superior to his previous QT 45 or NPS 1260 signal enhancer gel. I think the claim is it increases conductivity and seals outside RF/EMI interference.

ozzy

Today I rotated my power tubes in my mono block amps, turned them on and one amp didn’t come on. Hmm...

I guess I did not have one of the tubes inserted properly and the Fuse box shut the amp/power down. Once I found the tube that was installed incorrectly the Fuse box and the amp powered on.

So, to me, this is proof that the Fuse Box works as described!

ozzy