Swiss Digital Fuse Box - "What headroom sounds like"


Swiss Digital Fuse Box (SDFB) is non-sacrificial overcurrent protection device that serves as a replacement for fuses in audio equipment.

There are four devices in my sound system that I’ve replaced fuses with the SDFB, and its transformative capacity to upgrade sound quality beyond that of fuses has compelled me to write a review. I’m not associated with Verafi Audio, the company that sells them, nor did I receive anything from them as "review units". There’s another thread on Audiogon about them that an audiophile friend referred me to, which got me interested enough to buy them. I am now enamored with the sound of my system in its current state, so I wanted to share my take on one of the more significant steps in how I arrived here.

Before getting into details about its form and function, I want to share my impression of what the Swiss Digital Fuse Box (SDFB) does for sound quality. It makes my components sound like they are operating without any limitation of power. It sounds open and unrestricted across the audio frequency spectrum. The sound is dynamic, detailed, defined, and there a sense of harmony and completeness about it. It’s like my components can now output their full frequency and harmonic potential.

A few things about me... I’m more of an artist than anything. I’ve been a music lover for 35 years and an electric bass player for 15 of those years playing in two bands, with which I was the bass player on one full LP recording and one EP. I’ve recorded, mixed and mastered my own multi-layered solo bass recordings and their backing tracks from sampled percussion using digital audio workstation software. I’ve also fine-tuned two of my custom car audio systems using DSP software and built, tweaked, and tuned a high end home stereo system (yes I said *tuned*, without using DSP) . Given this experience and the resultant development of a keenly perceptive and informed "ear", yet having no formal electrical theory or engineering background, I feel comfortable suggesting that the results of using SDFB can be likened to how audio sounds when the device producing it is operating with ample headroom. What does headroom sound like? The term headroom has different meanings in its use within pro audio recording/engineering and electrical circuitry operation, but they are related in a way that the end result sounds uncompressed, undistorted, fully dynamic, and expresses the sense of the effortlessness of unrestricted flow.

Does this sound like embellishment? It probably does. And I haven’t even mentioned the typical audiophile terms like "inner detail", "layering", or "rock solid imaging", nor have I even mentioned soundstaging attributes yet -- even though all of these qualities have also gone through upgrades due to the SDFB’s being installed. Am I merely in an irrational, excited state because my whole system now sounds much more expensive than it is? I don’t think so. I’ve been using all four SDFB units for three weeks consistently, and the initial excitement phase I was experiencing settled at least a week ago. I also think that the more components a system has which have replaceable fuses, the greater the potential upgrade from replacing each of those fuses with SDFBs. Like I said, I replaced all fuses in four of my audio components (six fuses in total), and there were notable step-up improvements in sonics as I progressively installed each of them.

Now I’ll describe the physicality of the device and how to use it. Then, I’ll try to describe specifics about why my previous fuse setup, which was a combination of Synergistic Research Purple and Master fuses, was completely replaced by SDFBs. These SR fuses were already a major upgrade in sound relative to the stock, generic fuses, and the SDFBs transcended the SR fuses in every discernible way.

These things have two separate parts that work together: 1) a small box that is inserted as the middle of a chain created between an audio component and the electrical outlet from which it draws power, and 2) a solid, cylindrical metal slug (referred to as a "Sluggo") which is the same size as the typical fuse. To install a SDFB, first, with your component off, plug its power cable into the AC socket on one end of the box, and on the other end of the box there is a male IEC connector (C14) which you connect to an outlet using another power cable or an adapter. I’m using a combination of two short, homemade mini-cables, and two generic adapters with my four SDFBs for the best sound (details shared in my Audiogon virtual system). Once the box is connected to a live electrical line, it will go through a brief setup period, and after maybe 8-10 seconds, you’ll hear a clicking sound and the small green LED will stay lit, indicating that charge is now allowed to flow through the box. The second and final step, with the component still off, is to replace the fuse(s) with a Sluggo. The device comes with both copper and brass Sluggos. You can then turn the component on. Don’t replace a fuse with a Sluggo without the SDFB in place because you’ll have no overcurrent protection and you’ll incur the risk of severely damaging your component and/or having a catastrophic fire in the even of a short circuit or other overcurrent scenario.

These units monitor current magnetically, and are calibrated to whatever fuse rating is needed when you order them. They are also calibrated to operate as either slow blow, or fast blow, like a normal fuse. When the set parameters are exceeded (too much current), a relay is switched to the closed position and charge is halted from flowing. Being non-sacrificial, you don’t need to buy a new one, you just unplug it from the outlet for about 30 seconds and it will reset the state. Then it can be plugged back in and reused. There’s no damage done to the device due to the overcurrent condition, unlike a fuse which melts due to high heat. Currently, devices being produced are to be calibrated at 10 amps max, so if there is some crazy high current event, perhaps then it could be damaged. I don’t know. I believe that’s pretty unlikely though. I think I remember reading that there’s a 15 amp version in the works.

There is some inconvenience involved with transitioning to SDFB due to the extra weight of the box (not that heavy, really) and extra length added to the power chain, as well as potentially requiring additional investment in more power cables. I feel that I achieved an optimal result for only about $200 of additional investment by using some DYI cable materials I had available, some high quality plugs to terminate the cable with, and some cheapo adapters from Amazon. For me, dealing with the extra weight and length to the cabling and putting in the work to create the best solution for connecting the SDFBs to my power conditioners has not been a big deal compared to the profound jump in sound quality. Totally worth it.

Before I went all SDFBs, the best configuration I found with SR fuses in my system was one small Master fuse in the LPS that powers the modem and router (I have an all-digital streaming system), two small Master fuses in the DAC, one small Purple fuse in the preamplifier, and two large Purple fuses in the amplifier. It’s worth mentioning that total retail cost of this setup is about 33% more expensive than the retail cost of my final SDFB setup. However, if you choose to buy a bunch of new, expensive power cables to connect your SDFBs, that would quickly become more the more expensive option.

I thought the SR setup sounded great at the time. I was impressed with the top end detail that a few of the Master fuses added to the fuller midrange and mid-bass sound of the Purple fuses which I already had. I’ve seen comments from others on this site in agreement about this. This combination is getting some praise. However, when comparing that sound to the SDFB sound, it was like the SR fuses are stuck at a level of trying to boost certain frequency ranges to make up for how restrictive a fuse really essentially sounds.

How do you improve on a small, low resolution, blurry, drab looking photo? Well, you manipulate it in Photoshop, of course! You try to crank up values of various visual (light-based) metrics to make it more attractive. However, that process will never produce something as close to the original subject as when you start with an ultra-high resolution, high-dynamic range photograph. You can’t "add resolution" to something that is intrinsically underpinned to a state of reduced resolution. To me, this is analogous to the task of starting with the tiny, resistive piece of wire in a fuse and trying to add crystals and various substances of specific resonant frequencies inside and around it to end up with something representative of the innate completeness of the source material.

Comparatively speaking, I was surprised to switch back to the SR setup and find that the soundstage was compressed towards the center. It was like there was a somewhat spherical haziness in center stage from which the sound was straining to emanate from, even with the Master fuses in play. I attribute this sense of "haziness" to a combination of reduced dynamic range, and a distortion of the frequency response coming from the system’s components. If the hypothetical ideal response for a natural sound (assuming the important aspects of room acoustics and one’s hearing quality are held constant) is essentially a linear response from top to bottom in both amplitude and purity, then the sound of the SR setup was now perceived as distorted and a deviation from linearity.

The sound of the SDFB setup is far more natural, far more detailed, and imparts a sense of ease while listening. I’m using all copper Sluggos, as their tonality is more natural to me than the brass versions. The soundstage has opened up with more dimensionality and all of that perceived haziness and limitation of full expression is (seemingly) completely gone. Images became more defined and image positioning is on a more advanced level. I can now perceive the two singers positioned near center and side-by-side in the mix, with a gap of about about a head’s-width between their mouths. This wasn’t perceivable with the SR fuses. The positioning of cymbals on a well recorded drumset are precisely locateable in space. Listening to Russion choral music, I can now hear individual tenor and bass voices and their unique tonal qualities. On one excellent recording of a solo harp, there’s beautiful overtones resonating that I’ve never been able to hear before. The sound is descriptively harmonious.

Over the course of a couple weeks, the sound of these units opened up. To begin, there was some minor coloration of the sound, but I’m not sure I can hear it any more. I think most of it has gone away as the units have burned in. Even with the minor coloration in the beginning, the immediate leap above the SR fuses in sound quality was obvious and highly desirable.

One last thing, I did a rough test of the overcurrent protection functionality, as this is obviously a major thing to get right and have working properly. I’ve been told that most refrigerators pull about 1 amp of current, so I used that as a basis for testing since I don’t have any more sophisticated method (I could use my desktop computer PSU which has a wattage display to achieve more accurate testing, but I’d rather not have its power suddenly cut and risk problems). I have two SDFBs calibrated to trip at levels below 1 amp, and two units calibrated at significantly above 1 amp. With each of the two sub-1A units inline with the fridge’s power cable (doing two test rounds for each unit), they immediately tripped and the fridge’s power was disconnected when I plugged in the power chain into the outlet. For the above-1A units (also did two test rounds each), the units did not cut power, and the fridge turned on and operated normally. I feel like this testing demonstrates enough for me to have a boost in confidence in the overcurrent protection operational integrity.

Being able to safely use solid metal slugs in place of fuses is wholly a paradigm shift in a high end audio system’s sound quality potential. These things deserve attention and I’m grateful to have been pointed to them.


https://verafiaudiollc.com

128x128gladmo

Showing 9 responses by carlsbad2

Everyone associates fuses with fire. that can be the case but not usually. Fuses can be implemented for 3 things:

1. Fire protection. they are required by codes for that reason.

2. Equipment protection.

3. Financial protection.

Most fuses in stereo equipment are for the 2nd and 3rd reasons. Fire protection is the primary function of the breaker panel at your house, protecting wires from overheating in the event of an overload. These wires run through the walls where there is lots of fuel for a fire.

Stereo equipment fuses are almost always put there to protect the equipment. There is no fire loading (fuel) in an amplifier. In the event of an overcurrent situation a component will fail, there will be puff of smoke, and the fuse may, or more likely may not, blow.

Now why are fuses bad? Fuses by their nature limit power. We buy 100 lb power supplies and 10 awg power cables, then we strain all the power going into our amplifier through a filament the size of a human hair. would you put a tiny resistor in series with your power in to your amp? Well that is what a fuse is.

I am an Engineering Manager at a very large facility and have discussed this at length with my fire protection engineer who is highly respected in the industry. He agrees there is no fire danger inside an amp. If there is any fire danger is is likely the unexpected failure of large caps and fuses do nothing to protect against this.

So I know I’m not going to change many minds with this post and indeed, everyone has their own risk tolerance. Most people were told from age 3 by their mother that if you put the wrong fuse in a holder the house will spontaneously combust and that mentailty isn’t going to change reading an internet post. So if fuses make you sleep better at night, indeed keep them on their pedestal. But fuses always degrade sound. Most people just accept that and that is ok.

Jerry

@lalitk I don't understand your problem.  the box has a short pigtail and will plug in where your current cable plugs in.  then your current cable plugs into the box.   Now putting this box in series with your $5000 cable strikes me as a head scratcher but don't know what to do about that.

Jerry

@recklesskelly How much product liabiity do you think Buss assumes for the 99c fuse that this breaker replaced?  Breakers are not new or different.  Not sure why this one is attacked other than fear of the unknown.   I guess people don't understand that you can jumper your fuse if you move the breaker 2" upstream in the circuit.

Now I think it is way overpriced.  It is a $30 breaker in a $50 box selling for $400.

Jerry

@vandy357 Don't expect nearly so much improvement or maybe none at all from low power equipment such as DAC, streamer etc.  Fuses have much less detremental effect when the current is very low.

@recklesskelly Yes they are a big company but next tie you have a component fail and the fuse didn't blow (I just had this happen last month) call buss up and tell them you'd like them to pay to fix it.

I don't think you'll get far.

Jerry

@recklesskelly I'm certainly not trying to argue.  I'm sure you saw my post of fire above and I know not everyone will agree with me.  

Here is my skeptical viewpoint on what the investigator blames a fire on:  they sift through the ashes, and can find very little.  they look for anything out of the ordinary, something that survived the fire.  they often find something that looks like it wasn't to code and often blame the fire on that, without any more evidence.  and that certainly wouldn't hold up in court.  but insurance compaies love to settle.  

They also ask the homeowner if they have modified any equipment or strung too many extension cords together, etc.  Sometimes they blame the fire on circumstail evidence if the homeowner says, "well, I did have quite a big cluster of wires under my desk, I guess I shouldn't have done that."

Sometimes they can conclude the area of the home where the fire started--the kitchen, the laundry room, etc.  If they determine it started in a stereo rack with 12 components in it, they won't be able to point the finger at a fuse.  I really doubt buss has ever been sued.

But I don't think you want to get there.  Perhaps you meant to ask, "Can you convince me my house won't burn down as a result of this breaker?"

Here is the situation I mentioned:  I bought an amp that uses EL84 output tubes.  I have another amp that uses 6P1T output tubes.  In a moment of mental unclarity, I somehow thought thew were interchangeable.  It turns out that the pinout is different and the 6P1T provided a direct short across the power supply to the heater.  I put them in and no music came out.  I smelled smoke and turned it off.  Put the right tubes in and it made noise for a few seconds and then went quiet.  I opened it up and found a smoked resistor.  Cost me about $5 for a new resistor and 10 minutes to install it.  I'll attach a photo of the 3 fuese that this amp uses to protect the output transformer.  None of them blew.  I'll also attach a photo of the current configuration of these fuse holders.  I gurantee they sound as good as a digital fuse box.  

And I hadn't seen the ones without the pigtail.  I undertand why when you've put $5k into a power cable, you don't want to add a new cable between it and your amp.  But the fuse is a tiny little resistor that limits current.  If I could afford a $5k cable (well, I guess I can, haven't chosen to buy one) then I would probably just put a slug in the fuse box and replace the amp if it fails...but I don't know what amp is in play here. Truthfully, it is very seldom that an amp fails in a way that blows the fuse.  

Finally, I really don't have a problem agreeing to disagree here.  I fully expect to be in the minority.  I've lived there my entire life.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/Anxbs6dppaNxi5bH7

Jerry

 

 

@jasonbourne71 I usually ignore you since you are farther toward "nothing matters" than those you criticize are toward "confirmation bias". as with most things in life, the answer is in the middle and you’ll never find it locked into one side or the other.

Since you addressed me by name I’ll reply. You ignore how much a fuse degrades the sound. As I’ve posted earlier in most cases I evaluate the risk and replace the fuse with a slug achieving even more than the SDFB does.

I have worked 40+ years at a power plant where I’ve been responsible for thousands of very high end breakers as engineering manager. I’ve been looking for and even challenging my electrical engineers to find a magnetic breaker that I could apply like this. I was going to make mine slip into the fuse box...as you can see there is an emotional resistance to putting a slug in a fuse holder, even if there is a breaker 2" away.

But this guy beat me to it. and while I did criticize the price, and I would never have picked such an oozing-with-marketing sounding name, this is not expensive for high end audio equipment. I’d say his markup is less than the high end calbes you don’t believe in.

I’ve never heard the SDFB in service but if the magnetic breaker he has found provides a high current, resistance free circuit (unlike fuses or thermal operated breakers which use a high resistance bimetal strip in the circuit) then I think this will provide about as much bang for the buck as any upgrade you can do (short of my slug-without-breaker mod).

Jerry

@jasonbourne71 looks like you went ot Uconn with my brother.  He got a PhD in English literature, not much more useful than your 2 years w/o a degree.  But he is a professor now, teaching other people about 600 to 800 year old plays.

I have some experience with SCRs in superconducting magnet power supplies.  They weren't terribly reliable but I have one cut in half for forensics around here somewhere. An SCR crowbar is an overvoltage protection circuit.  we are looking for overcurrent protection.  Good try....no, not really.

Using a breaker to replace a fuse is not patentable.  I could develop my own flavor and go compete.  (not a threat, I'm too busy with my day job and modding my system).  It is pretty easy to understand how this works:  jumper the fuse and insert a magneticly tripped circuit breaker.  They say they adjust it to trip at your desired current although it would surprise me if a small breaker like this is adjustable so I'm guessing they use a bridge circuit or something similar.

The setting isn't that critical.  Most manufacturers wet their finger and hold it up in the air to pick the size fuse they use.  and here's a dirty little secret, one reason the expensive audiophile fuses sound better is because they pass more current and fail at a higher value.   Note this is different than your home protection breakers which are sized for the wire in the circuit and should never be changed without an engineer's help. this type of sizing isn't possible for an exlectronic component. 

Stick to drafting.

Jerry

 

 

@fleschler  I'm glad you've had good luck with aftermarket fuses in your DAC.  Indeed, fuses are much more of an issue for amps but glad you hear a difference.

My DAC does not have a fuse.

Jerry