With all due respect to the OP, the question posed is a bad one from a scientific point of view; it cannot be answered simply or with a simple experiment. The responses that go in all possible directions so far are consistent with that fact. The huge variety of turntable suspensions (also counting no-suspension as a form of suspension) offered in the marketplace is further evidence that there is no "correct" answer to the question. In my opinion, those who try to develop suspensions for turntables must be very brave; it's a pit of snakes. No matter what one does, there is a new problem that comes with it. Personally, because of this, I favor unsuspended turntables, massive plinths, heavy duty shelving, concrete floors, etc. If you can afford a Vibraplane or Minus K, they're probably superior to most built-in suspensions but not perfect. For one "concrete" example, I've set up a second system in my basement, on the poured concrete flooring. This did great things for image solidity and reducing spurious noises that can be produced when the needle is disturbed in the groove, with a Lenco that I had earlier auditioned in my "upstairs" system.
A few guys mentioned great bass from a Linn. While I can like the sound from a well set-up Linn, I always find the bass to sound "light", not to say lacking. I've owned a SOTA Star Sapphire Series III; the bass was downright muddy, could as well have been due to belt stretching as to suspension flexing. However, I do agree that later generation Sota's are better in this respect.
A few guys mentioned great bass from a Linn. While I can like the sound from a well set-up Linn, I always find the bass to sound "light", not to say lacking. I've owned a SOTA Star Sapphire Series III; the bass was downright muddy, could as well have been due to belt stretching as to suspension flexing. However, I do agree that later generation Sota's are better in this respect.