Super integrated vs equivalent +$$ for new main system


Just upgraded my main speaker and would like to upgrade the overall setup, room is a 20’’x30’’, listening to variety of music from jazz, vocals, classic, and a bit of pop. Speaker are M30.2XD and a Rel T7i, Streaming only, Qobuz mainly, and might add a tt later on. I have a lfd and qutest laptop in an other room with the P3s, main was a Uniti atom. Tried the lfd IV with the m30, sweet mids but lack on the lower and composure, dont want to go with a ncse as there is no remote and want something simple. From those of you who did these upgrade. Is it better to go for a super integrated, (thinking of 1: Audio Gold Is 1000 deluxe(150w- 2: Naim nova 80w) or going separate + fuss with cable, keeping qutest, going with a Auralic Aries G1 to stream, and choose an integrated amp class AB, ( choice I looked at and listen to 1: Supernait 3 $, 2: Luxman 507ux ii $$) luxman would stretch my budget but would be a keeper, I prefer a limited number of box if that is possible
nicolascb

Showing 1 response by millercarbon

Gotta love the way Harbeth calls these "easy to drive" even though at 85dB they are virtually impossible to drive. Then someone "on a budget" pays good money only to learn sorry, forget about all the awesome integrated amps, these need a couple hundred watts to sound good. I feel for you.  

Integrated is always better in terms of price/performance, but not when you get up into the hundreds of watts like you need. Its a shame having speakers that the strength is finesse, but require an amp that is brute force. Another one went through almost the exact same thing not two months ago. With subs you can find an integrated like Raven with a sub out crossover. This will alleviate the amp having to drive the power hungry bottom end and maybe get you the best of both worlds. Forget what he did or how it worked out. Do a search maybe see how it went?