Subwoofer, Active Vs. Passive


I recently saw in a thread that most powered subwoofers usually have crappy amplifiers.

Any thoughts on this?

Which is believed to be better? Active or Passive?

If most subwoofers have somewhat crappy amplifiers, would you be better off using an bridged stereo ADCOM to drive a passive subwoofer?

Thinking of that, I dont see many passive subwoofers out there. Are there any good reputable companys that specialize in passive subwoofers?

Ive been looking into building my own subwoofer, just for the experience. Who out there uses Passive Subwoofers, what do you use to drive them and why?
slappy

Showing 1 response by sogood51

I made the post on the amp quality. My post was in regard to subs with balanced inputs, I stated that most amp quality in active subs was about $80 and that many active subs have very short warranty on the sub amp. These statements are true in most cases but not all and were made in regards to the % of active subs on the market with high quality amps (not many). I won't get into which type (passive/active) sub is better because there is no real answer so the buyer must do their homework. Building a sub would be a great project for you Slappy, there are many kit's on the market and most can come with pre built cabinet if you have no woodworking skills...you will not need a crossover if you are going to use the one in your pre/pro. My sub is a large passive (Vmps) and can be orderd as a kit. I drive it with an Onkyo M-504 amp that puts out 325 watts into it's 4 ohm load. This sub is the bottom half of my Large Vmps Supertowers which I also sometimes use as subs for a three sub setup. Hope this is more clear, there are many good active subs on the market from high-end companys that use good amps...there are just many, many more who don't.

Dave