I am not an attorney, but I just can't see where this case has any merit.
To my way of thinking, if it did have merit, Randy California (the party who was harmed) would have filed decades ago (when he was alive). His heirs probably got the idea and approached a law firm who would take the case on "contingency", and the law firm figured that, even if they lost, the free publicity would be worth it.
To my way of thinking, if it did have merit, Randy California (the party who was harmed) would have filed decades ago (when he was alive). His heirs probably got the idea and approached a law firm who would take the case on "contingency", and the law firm figured that, even if they lost, the free publicity would be worth it.