thanks for the links @immathewj I am diving into it
speakers and cables
this is about me being a loser and problem creator.
I finally got a 2nd subwoofer and I was excited to hook it up. Well, not too excited. I knew it would be a pain to hook it up. I was excited to hear it. I spent over 90 minutes connecting the speaker wires to my power amp. When I turned it on, the left channel was gone. It blew the fuse. I disconnected everything, replaced the fuse, hooked it up again. It worked for 10 seconds, blew the fuse again.
The way I hooked them up was I went from the sub speaker out from both subwoofers, rolled the left and right side wires together so I had 4 wires that I connected to the left and right plus and minus channels - speaker binders on the power amp. What are my options? My preamp has no sub out. Nor my amp.
Stupid question: should I just go from left to left on one sub and right to right on the other sub?
Showing 50 responses by grislybutter
@immatthewj
most everything I have is crappy (except for my TT and bookshelf speakers). Just one RCA out from preamp. I can use a splitter no sub out from amp I can’t buy another component, I have to make what I have work. It’s a 45 year old amp with the tightest binding posts. (That’s why it took 90 minutes, to group and isolate naked wires in 1/20 inches of spaces.) |
thanks @immatthewj that makes sense. I do have this except that it does not work https://outlawaudio.com/products/icbm.html I bought it for $120 and it came busted and I can’t send it back. (Being poor stings twice - when you can’t buy things and then when you finally buy something cheap and shady and get scammed) But why should I complain, having two subwoofers is not a basic need And yes, my preamp has only one RCA out pair |
@immatthewj I understand your description. It makes sense. What I did was duplicating the output (that I used to have for ONE sub). I should just treat the subs and the speakers, as left and right channels. I tried. Few bucks of fuses are not the end of the World. I will try your suggestion tomorrow. |
@immatthewj you are very thorough and kind and helpful. I have exactly what is on the photo I included. It's this model. https://www.polkaudio.com/en-us/product/home-speakers/subwoofers/psw-10/112479-new.html it has RCA in, LFE inputs too. (And they sound great to my ear) |
thanks @akgwhiz! @immatthewj I am sufficiently confused as I try to visualize it with my limited options but at least I am positive you know how it works on your end. My setup - if my Outlaw had worked I think it would be sub (RCA) |
@audio_guy_uofw yes it helps thank you. I have about 5 millimeters between the speaker binders and my speaker wires are thick. I could look for thinner speaker wires. I sold my beloved Marantz amp for this reason, impossible speaker binders, swapping speakers was an afternoon long activity. I am giving it one last try, hopefully it will leave the fuse alone. |
@mashif my bad - I do have an out from my preamp. I call preamp out from integrated amps - but you are right. So yes, that’s a good suggestion
@immatthewj thanks for the clarification. It wasn't your fault, I am easily confused. Your explanations are always very thorough. I am looking up Y splitters now on Amazon. |
@akgwhiz that’s interesting? It would be much easier for because the speakers’ bindings are modern - easy to access. thanks @mashif - that's a good price. (And then I clicked on the 77K speaker cable) |
@immatthewj I have the same feeling about Y splitters, not very audiophile-ish. But - also cheaper than a box. I have not tried "serializing" subs and speakers. I want the signal to go from my amp directly to the speakers to somehow justify my semi-decent Morrow Audio speaker cables. (In the same time, at my level, speaker cables don't matter)
|
@immatthewj The short answer is I don’t know. I follow your train of thought and I believe in the shortest path and signal purity too. Electricity is a mystery to me though so I just believe what I read. I think I have a compromised system (a nice way of saying "crappy") and using your analogy, it’s a glass with dirt on it, an extra layer of dirt won’t make a huge difference. These passive components are essentially cables/cable connectors. The signal will degrade for sure, but maybe not much. In my system, the amp and the speakers make 90% of the difference (assuming my records are clean). I can hear the difference in the turntable but preamps, amps and speakers are 30% each. Cables, interconnects, electricity, vibration control, barely noticeable. Having said that, everything counts, still:
I agree with that and you significantly reduced my desire for it, thank you! Long story short, I enjoy and learn a lot from your comments. And despite my limitations, I love listening to my rig, it sounds awesome. It’s all relative.... |
@immatthewj I also thought of this. I know it’s lame but fairly cheap and maybe by Christmas I can budget for it; it could be nice visuals and a speaker "multiplier". If it could handle it. |
thank you @carlsbad2, I am a big fan of Erik but I had a lot of good advice and options so far including yours. Once my coffee kicks in, I will try and compare them. Wiring-wise yours is the least stressful. |
@immatthewj I think your ear can train your brain, and your brain can work with your ears to look for more details. But it truly only matters with discerning systems, "anyone" can hear the difference between a bluetooth pill and and car radio. We are in this hobby because we look for the perfect sound. So you can probably hear a lot more than you think :) I remember your example from Colombo. I also like Andrew Jones’s explanation that everything is determined to be flawed from the source to the speaker and what engineers do is fixing errors along the way. (Paraphrasing)
|
@immatthewj I need to find the right gain but they sound good. A bit shaky/buzzy on their flimsy legs so I should find a better platform. I listened to a pair of $60 Celestion F3s for 6 weeks and I just switched back to my Evoke 20s, they sound extremely bright, suddenly. I like the Celestions overall better but I am going to give them a week. What I like about the subwoofers is that they very subtle. (Unlike others I tried they wanted to crack the ceiling.) I don't need a lot of bass, just that little extra the bookshelf speakers can't fill. |
@immathewj OK. that would make sense. I will check out the manual for the PSW10 if indeed it matches the crossover. (I also might just open up the beast and see if there is a crossover). It does sound "thinner" maybe because I am keeping the low frequency from the speakers and I should dial it down. And overall, the "sound chaos" I sometimes had when I set the frequency on the sub too high is gone. Incredible how simple minded I can be and clueless about such simple things. Until I am not! Thanks for figuring out my limitations One benefit would be, if the frequencies were split, for the bookshelf speakers to have to produce the sound in a smaller range - which then makes the sub placement even more important. |
@immathewj @mswale @thecarpathian I apologize if I confused or frustrated anyone. I know it's a simple issue for people who know what they are doing. I clearly don't. In the process, I learned a few things though. The silver lining is that if I had a sub out or pre out on my component, I wouldn't have gone down in these rabbit holes and would not have learned anything. I also learned many ways to degrade a signal |
@immathewj I think this is a @thecarpathian suggestion:
One thing I have read was about the wiring was strong advice about parallel wiring. The Y splitters should arrive tonight, will be interesting how it sounds. At this point I am embarrassed about a number of remaining questions, so I will just keep them to myself and play with it to try to confirm my assumptions...
|
@immathewj I will probably go back to high level connections. So far I have mixed feelings about the splitter. I will give it another day of listening and then switch and compare. Overall, it also gives me perspective that these may not be the best speakers for me and I should go back an integrated amp, start with the latter first. I know a 45 year old amp (Hafler DH-200) will become more pain than fun eventually. I am working around limitations and it feels like I am always coming up short. Part of it is that I expect more and more and I feel I accomplish less - a purely emotional aspect. Thanks for all your help, it's fun journey though :) I think the more complex the sound is the more critical we become. |
@immathewj yes you are right. An integrated would do it. If ebay didn't charge an arm and a leg, I would sell my power amp today. @mswale my subs' dial start at 80Hz so I can't go below that. I agree with you that less is more, I need just subtle bass to extend the image. First it felt like the drummers went mad :) |
@yogiboy Nobody buys what I have on any site other than on ebay. I know, my gear has been posted for close to nothing for 8 months. On ebay I get an offer in 2 days. Because the stuff is heavy, and ebay charges on the shipping too, I get 60 cents on the dollar. In this case, I would make around $80 if I am lucky. |
@mswale I guess you meant "confusing". Yes, I am often confused and I am very good at confusing others. I had read for years here how a sub makes a difference before I looked into buying a sub. And then I read that one sub is almost meaningless, you need at least two. My bass isn’t muddy but "reverby" at times. I don’t mind adding a low pass filter and reconnecting my subs. You linked an 80Hz filter - would it be OK to add a low pass filter for a higher frequency to let my subs go higher, like 100Hz? I will measure the frequencies of the mains today if I find a decent app. |
@mswale it is a compromise (mainly for the simple reason I had to swear to my wife many times I am done spending money on audio), and 2 steps back 2(3) steps forward process.
No, but one of my ideas was to get a speaker switch. I am interested in this low cost low pass solution, as it should fix the overlap.
|