Speaker Technology over the last 10 years


I bought my last pair of speakers 13 years ago, Legacy Classic. How much has speaker technology changed since then? I know in terms of amp and cd player there has been tremendous advancements but what about speakers?

Are speakers for the most part dependent upon the source? I appreciate any comments.
revrob

Showing 2 responses by rebbi

Although the original poster was referring to the overall trajectory of loudspeaker technology over the past decade or so, I'd also like to toss into the mix the factor of loudspeaker VALUE for the price.

My own sense and experience here is that there has been a gratifying "bang for the buck" improvement over the years, and that's even taking inflation into account. There are some astonishingly good loudspeakers out there for well under $1000 these days, and the values get even better if you are willing to consider used equipment.

Case in point: I had to sell my old pair of original, 1985-vintage Vandersteen 2C speakers about a year ago due to moving into a much smaller listening room than the one I had 20 years ago (read: low wife acceptance factor). This led me to reacquaint myself with what's out there now, over 20 years down the road, and I have to say I've been very impressed. I had the opportunity to listen to Totem Arros, Ohm Micro Walsh Talls, Ohm 100s and Silverline Preludes in my home. I ended up settling on the Ohm 100s and I'm extremely pleased. But in the other speakers I mentioned measured up extremely well, and although they are quite different in character than my old Vandersteen speakers, I am very impressed by the value that's available now. If I remember correctly, the Vandersteen's set me back around $1200... and those were 1985 dollars! :-)

So I think that one of the exciting developments in speaker technology over the past 25 years is that there are some great bargains available out there. It's true that the cost-no-object designs of the most expensive manufacturers have probably gone up in price, but in some ways, I find the ability to get wonderful sound out of less expensive products to be even more interesting.
I would say putting trust into something souly designed by computers is a recipe for failure.

This makes sense to me. Consider, for example, Totem, which makes a big deal of how their speakers are designed and tuned by ear, how they don't use the facilities of the big, government-supported acoustical research labs in Canada. Totem speakers are highly regarded for their musicality.

On the other hand, I remember when I first started following high-end audio in the 1980's how TAS and other high-end publications scoffed at the writing of Julian Hirsch and others whose reviews prominently features graphs and response curves, as if those measurements really told you all you needed to know about the quality of a speaker.