Speaker positioning: why do audiophiles neglect this so much?


Went to a recent seminar featuring Jim Smith, well known author of the book  "Get Better Sound"  and hi fi set up guru.

The basic gist of the discussion was that the most important elements of a high end stereo installation are listening position and speaker positioning, in that order.  The actual hardware (speakers, amplifiers, source, cables etc) are of less importance relatively speaking.

Yet it is clear from this web site and it's contents, that set up is discussed much less than the actual hardware.

When I look at the Virtual Systems page on site, I'm estimating that, maybe, 10% of the systems posted are close to well set up.  Thus, hardly any of the featured hardware is performing close to it's maximum potential.

Shame, and why is it so?  Not sexy enough to talk about system set up in depth?  Lack of knowledge?  Or is it simply too hard to do and too complex a subject?

Just my 2 cents ...

bobbydd

Showing 1 response by goose

Speaker placement is tricky.  Of course having nothing between the speakers would be preferred but long cable runs or equipment placement may prevent that from happening.

I tried multiple placement configurations based on several "mathematical" models.  There are too many variables with furnishings to make it truly work but can be used as a general guide.  I found the most effective placement technique was to use the Wilson audio set up guide with the room furnished as you plan to use it.  I also found it effective to use the Jim Smith guide relative to the speakers and listening chair.  The distance between the speakers are 83 to 86% of the distance from the speakers to the listening chair.  Just my two cents worth.