Speaker Jumper Cables Revisited


I know there are multiple threads on Audiogon dealing with this topic, but a recent experience with budget speakers was significant enough I wanted to share to see if others have experienced similar results.  

My office system has a pair of Wharfedale Diamond 12.0’s (biwirable) flanking my computer monitor.  They are driven by a laptop computer running JRiver Media Center, an Audioquest Dragonfly Red DAC and a Rega BrioR (Gen 1).  ICs and speaker cables are decent quality Audioquest.  I also have a Monitor Audio subwoofer.  All components are on modest power conditioners and have upgraded power cables.

I asked the salesman when I purchased the Wharfedales if he thought replacing the stock jumpers would improve their sound, and he said “maybe, but I doubt it”.  I have some experience with much older Diamond 8 series speakers, and I experimented with removing the metal plate jumpers and replacing with various home brew and store bought jumpers to some positive effect.  After breaking in the 12.0s, while I generally liked the sound, I can’t help tinkering.  I looked into buying premade jumpers, but name brand jumpers with quality materials are bloody expensive, like quickly approaching the cost of the speakers themselves.  No thanks.

I looked on eBay and found some flat ribbon jumpers that are supposedly silver plated OCC copper with very sturdy looking Gold plated spade connectors.  Very Nordost like, but unbranded.  They were $11 plus change.  Probably not made in Massachusetts, LOL.  At first they sounded hard and brassy at volume.  Undeterred, I let them cook for several weeks at background volume levels and didn’t really pay any attention.  

A month or so after replacing the stock plates with the eBay jumpers, I did some serious listening.  WOW!  I mean REALLY WOW!!  I was hearing what sounded like completely different and better speakers.  All harshness was gone. In near field listening, the soundstage was deeper and more defined both laterally and vertically. Treble had more speed and air, and notes hung in the air for what seemed like the exact right amount of time before disappearing.  Midrange had more bite when called for and was appropriately smooth and mellow when that was in the recording.  Both male and female vocals were more convincing.  Bass is not a big thing with a 4” woofer, but what bass there is was both cleaner and faster.

Adding the eBay jumpers made the modestly priced Diamond 12.0’s sound closer to, and in some aspects better than the speakers in my reference system which cost about six times as much, and in some aspects maybe sound a little better.  It really sounded like I had dropped a much better DAC into the system.

My previous experience with jumping the older Wharfedale Diamonds didn’t prepare me for what I heard from the new Diamond 12.0 with inexpensive but apparently high quality jumpers.  This is a testament to the both the design success of the latest Diamond series from Wharfedale, and to the quality of cabling available on the market now at a low cost, presumably from China.  I do not know if the copper in the cable is really OCC, or the spades are really gold-plated copper instead of brass, but it sure sounds like it.  Oh, and the salesperson was totally wrong, OK?  YMMV

kn

Ag insider logo xs@2xknownothing

Showing 2 responses by soix

Great post.  Always thought highly of Wharfedale Diamonds, especially at their very reasonable price points, so nice to hear some confirmation of this. 

Thought I’d share my experience with jumpers that’s a bit of a different use case but made a meaningful improvement in my system so thought it worth mentioning again.  When I was reviewing some Stereovox cables years ago Chris Sommovigo (RIP) highly suggested I try his jumpers using bananas in addition to the shotgun bi-wire cables I was already using with spades.  Suffice it to say I was pretty skeptical, but considering the source I gave it a try and so glad I did!  The two main benefits I heard right away was better imaging with better perceived clear space between the images — kinda like what you hear when the noise floor drops with other equipment improvements if that makes sense — and the other obvious benefit was notably quicker, tighter bass.  I won’t say these were night and day differences, but they were important and significant nonetheless, and the jumpers remain in place today and I won’t listen without them such is the level of improvement if that says anything.  So if you’re currently bi-wiring I’d encourage you to at least try or demo some reasonably-priced jumpers (my cables are Acoustic Zen so don’t think sticking to the same brand or spending $$$ may be necessary in this application) and see if you get meaningful improvements.  Hey, in the scheme of upgrades/tweaks in this hobby this one could well be one of the more cost effective out there.  Just FYI and FWIW.

that is really surprising!  I never would have thought to do that with fully bi-wired speaker set-ups.

Yup — me nether.  Coulda bowled me over with a feather. 

BTW, that’s really interesting about the new designer — I had no idea.  That significantly more performance has apparently been achieved and assuming they’re still priced in the same ballpark that’s quite an achievement in and of itself.  But what’s maybe even more impressive still is that they were able to make the cabinets more inert at the same time, which I have to think not only adds significantly to manufacturing costs but also adds weight and thus higher shipping costs.  And as we know, cabinets can be a large part of a speaker’s overall cost and price.  Again, very impressive, and thanks for the additional info!