wolf_garcia"All nonsense with expectation bias driving new users to the fraudulently misrepresented Magic Fuses,"
Fraud! Fraud! Fraud! Once again we see charges of illegal activity that would delight anyone dedicated, sincere, or intelligent enough to pursue a typical American "Class Action Suit" against those perpetrating this vile, predatory, unspeakable deception on the gullible, uneducated, and naive why is it though that no one ever pursues such a claim through proper established, legal, regulatory channels perhaps it is because they themselves represent the fraud? I am just asking not making accusation! |
roberttcan43 posts10-21-2019 5:58pm75% of the world believes in a deity, pick any of those people and between 50% and 99% of that 75% thinks their deity is a delusion. 100% of those 75% have absolutely no verifiable proof that a deity exists."
People are free to observe, practice, and follow they're religion without being subject to your threats, insults, and attacks and none of us have to prove anything to you so you're attacks on faith and religion have no place here. |
roberttcan"As does the number of people following religion, mainly due to high birth rates in highly religious societies (outside the US)."
People are free to observe, practice, and follow they're religion without being subject to your threats, insults, and attacks.
" As does the amount spent on Homepathic remedies. As does the amount spent on penis pills."
I do not know what you mean by "penis pills" you seem to be suffering from some cognitive problem. |
roberttcan"If anyone, I mean anyone actually did a controlled listening test, not even measurements, but an actual controlled listening test (which is double blind by the way), then may, just maybe there would be no ridicule when one claims enormous improvements"
Users are free to post hear free of you're personal attacks, ridicule, and threats there is no need to conduct scientific tests even though many of us have done just that. |
roberttcan" in controlled testing, fast switching has resulted in a far higher likelihood of a difference being noted."
I am pleased to see you acknowledge that abx testing has resulted in revealing differences between audio components this is something you and many others seem to like to deny or refute. |
roberttcan"So that must mean you are willing to publicly participate in a double blind ABX test, results published of course, perhaps even put some money into the bet. I am more than willing to do that."
We don't want you to steal money from you're mommy's purse, and she probably doesn't have enough USD$$$$ to play in this game. |
roberttcan"he started his company right around the time he was busted down to training co-ordinator"
That sounds like a vile, offensive, and abusive characterization so I would only reply as you do in you're own words that "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
|
roberttcan"Your post is brutally ignorant, horribly misinformed, stupendously communicative of your lack of education or literacy"
You seem to have a problem with comprehension, understanding, and reasoning and you're claims as a result do not withstand or survive even the most trivial, brief, cursory review. |
roberttcanT"this document may appear detailed, authoritative and informative. To someone skilled in the art, it is amateurish and flawed... That is not at all a justification for no pictures or no equipment list...With every report is a picture of the test setup AND and equipment list."
I understand you're wish, desire, and preference for pretty pictures but for educated, informed, literate readers such pictures are just a nuisance that get's in the way of analyzing, assessing, and verifying actual data.
The report does not include all of the background information because that is consistent from study to study and is otherwise available there is no need to report it individually for each study what is obvious here is that once someone comes out with actual data you shoot it down but you have no data yourself to supplant it even though you claim to have actual done extensive research and studies to support the millions of electronic devices you claim to have manufactured.
|
roberttcan" GECOM technologies document is not a proper report of a metrology testing lab, this is purely a marketing document and an auspicious one at that. Let’s point out the BS in the document: 1) No listing of equipment is provided, no pictures of test setups,’ That is very funny you are attacking this detailed, authoritative, informative report because it does not have pictures! The report does not include all of the background information because that is consistent from study to study and is otherwise available there is no need to report it individually for each study what is obvious here is that once someone comes out with actual data you shoot it down but you have no data yourself to supplant it even though you claim to have actual done extensive research and studies to support the millions of electronic devices you claim to have manufactured. |
