@vvcv A nice plan B to consider:
If you are set on the type 45 power tube, why not get an amp that uses a pair in push-pull? I've done direct comparisons; the thing about any SET is that you really don't want to run them past about 20% of their total output power, since higher ordered harmonics start showing up on the transients (where the power is). This causes the amp to sound 'dynamic' as the ear uses the higher ordered harmonics to sense sound pressure- its distortion masquerading as 'dynamics'.
But with the same tube operating in push-pull, but otherwise class A and zero feedback, the total power will be more like 6-7 watts and about 90% of that power will be usable as opposed to 20%. So you will have a much wider range of speakers you can play.
Now to the comparison; side by side it was obvious that the push-pull amp using 45s was more detailed (vocals were easier to make out) and had more bandwidth both in the bass and the highs and every bit as smooth. IOW, no downside except you need a pair of power tubes per channel.
If you are set on the type 45 power tube, why not get an amp that uses a pair in push-pull? I've done direct comparisons; the thing about any SET is that you really don't want to run them past about 20% of their total output power, since higher ordered harmonics start showing up on the transients (where the power is). This causes the amp to sound 'dynamic' as the ear uses the higher ordered harmonics to sense sound pressure- its distortion masquerading as 'dynamics'.
But with the same tube operating in push-pull, but otherwise class A and zero feedback, the total power will be more like 6-7 watts and about 90% of that power will be usable as opposed to 20%. So you will have a much wider range of speakers you can play.
Now to the comparison; side by side it was obvious that the push-pull amp using 45s was more detailed (vocals were easier to make out) and had more bandwidth both in the bass and the highs and every bit as smooth. IOW, no downside except you need a pair of power tubes per channel.