2. cables
  3. 143357-5939

Sell your $$$ cables and conditioners... affordable LITHIUM is here!

I wanted to give you a frame of reference as to where I'm coming from and most importantly a first impression after 24hrs!
I've been an addict since my first system of KEF Concord speakers, Crimson Electric amps and an Ariston turntable back in college in '81. Since then I've been down the entire Linn system with Active Kabers, Full Meridian active system with DSP5200's as well as some burly NZ Perraux mono blocks with Sonus Faber when I lived in NZ. Since moving to the US in 2001 I've been through years of altercations between solid state camps from Bel Canto, Levinson stereo 336 to mono 436's, 532H and Mac 452 to speakers from B&W 802N and D2 to Wilson Sophia 2's, Sonus Faber Amati Homage and Revel Studio 2's. I've tried conditioners from Transparent, AQ Niagra, Isotek and others and every time come back to a decent cable straight from the wall.
Three years ago I took the plunge and went down the Devialet rabbit hole, streaming direct from a MacBook Air with ROON my Devialet D200 (soon to become a D400) drives my Focal Utopia Diablos via Analysis Plus Solo Crystal 8 speaker cables (and that's another whole can of worms with enormous cable differences), a JL Audio Fathom F110 (also about to be doubled up) rounds it out. My livening room is about 22x25 with 10ft ceilings and partially treated as best I can accommodate. 
Suffice to say, I've been around the block with hifi, listened to way more than my fair share at dealers and friends with diverse systems and currently run one of the most reveling systems I've ever heard. Sure, there's not that thick syrupy warmth the tube guys will clammer for, but then I'm hearing so much further into not just tonality but intent within the playing. 

If you read the review in Enjoy the Music from Tom Lyle, you'd see he equates the GZ Yeti to the $30k Stromtank. His review was the $400 Yeti 400. The Yeti 1000 was $1099, the 3kW Yeti 3000 is $2999 and will power almost anything. So, like Tom I took the plunge and bought a Yeti 1000 figuring it'd have plenty of 'headroom' for my meagre 600w consumption. (Though I have since plugged my JL Audio Fathom in too)

After playing the "FedEx f'ed up" again game, I finally went to their depot and picked up my new toy myself. After a handful of songs to establish a baseline for the evening, I simply plugged the Yeti 1000 in, reconnected the Devialet and sat back... My girlfriend was first to break the silence and then immediately regretted it as I couldn't help myself interrupting her for the next half hour of gushing over what a profound difference it was making.
H-U-G-E. Truly component level and an absolute game changer. 

I was immediately texting my good friend with his PS Audio Directstream, Gryphon Diablo, Audio Physic Avantera III all powered by the latest Synergistic Research Powercell 12SE and Gallileo power cord with AQ Hurricane to each component - SELL- SELL- SELL it all, get a Goal Zero! 

We stayed up until 2am listening, flipped it back for a handful of now unlistenable tracks and then back again to Yeti 1000 happiness. In over six hours of powering my Devialet and Fathom at 90+db levels it'd dropped to a laughable 98%. I'm guessing that means it'd run off the grid for 300hrs or more? That's probably a several months of listening for most people. Who even cares, it simply sounds spectacular and the single biggest improvement I've ever heard from anything less than a major amp or speaker upgrade. 

I know my system is fairly frugal and green running, my buddy Matts, Gryphon would probably need the 3000W Yeti as his amp pulls 1900W at full song and his full stack of components albeit front end certainly add a few hundred more.   He's headed down to me in a couple of week with a stack of exotic power cables and conditioners  to try and I can't wait to share my results - I'm guessing he'll want to steal it away for his own demo right after. I would imagine he'd even get away with the Yeti 1000, so long as he doesn't run it too hard?
leeagc

Showing 5 responses by ayrefan

ayrefan
8 posts
 
Also as previously posted, SQ (clarity) is better if the Yeti is not connected to its AC charger.
ayrefan
8 posts
 
I bought a Yet 400 last week and have found similar improvements in depth and width of soundstage as described by the OP when directly powering my DAC. However there seemed to be a drop in bass depth and speed / impact compared to using AC outlet power connected to my power conditioner (see below).

Here is my setup: Ayre QX-5 Twenty, Ayre AX-5 Twenty, both usually connected to an Ayre L-5xe power conditioner with Ayre (Cardas) PCs.  Interconnects: Cardas Clear XLR.  Nordost Bronze sort kones under QX-5 and AX-5. All components on Quadraspire Sunoco Vent Bamboo racks.  Speakers: KEF Blade 2.  Speaker cables: Cardas Clear.  Nordost Bronze sort kones under QX-5 and AX-5 (also provided striking improvements in SQ and staging). Myrtle wood blocks under L-5xe.

I was a good friend of Charles Hansen (Ayre Acoustics) hence “Ayrefan” but I still consider myself a relative newbie to HiFi and working on how best to describe changes in SQ.

According to the display on the Yeti, the Ayre QX-5 20 only draws 47W when operating in DAC mode so I could play for a 1.5 hours before fan activated on Yeti 400 (lead acid) with the QX-5 connected directly to the Yeti with an Ayre PC.  

However I wanted to try powering both the QX-5 and AX-5 connected to the L-5xe power conditioner so I purchased a Yeti 1400 lithium which arrived today.  After topping up the Yeti 1400 (fitted with MPPT charger) and connecting it to the L-5xe, I found that the QX-5 / AX-5 combo only draws ~150W at my usual listening volume (“24 out of 46” on AX-5) with a max of 170W indicated for a bass heavy track (volume at 26).  Given the Yeti 1400 is rated at a max of 1500W continuous it hardly broke a sweat.  I played music for 2 hours without the fan activating at all and available power only dropped by 9%.  Will try a longer listening session tomorrow to see how long Yeti 1400 goes before fan kicks in.

Okay, how did the system sound?. When I first switched from wall AC power (after 2 hour warm up for whole system) to Yeti 1400, soundstage was bigger in depth (front and rear) and some width.  Sound clarity and background great and bass depth similar to AC outlet power i.e. better than powering QX-5 directly with Yeti 400.

However, the transient (attack?) on vocals and particularly bass seemed slightly slower / softened.  I have to admit I was a bit worried.  Interestingly as the system played for longer with the Yeti 1400 the speed of attack on vocals improved a lot and same with bass impact. Soundstage is more enveloping with Yeti 1400 and whole sound of system is a bit warmer / mellow. Doesn’t quite slap you in the face like my system can on some tracks when powered from the wall (which can be fun). I have found that some vocals in certain tracks that could border on being bright using AC outlet power are better with Yeti 1400.  With the big Yeti powering the whole system via the Ayre power conditioner the bass depth / impact is restored compared to just powering the QX-5 directly with the Yeti 400.

 So far I am pleased, but Yeti 1400 apparently seems to need to break in a bit more and I will have to listen to a greater variety of tracks to get a better idea of what changes in SQ it is making. Going to switch Yeti to powering HT system and see what happens.

Boulder 200 solar panels arrive tomorrow so going to augment recharging with solar energy via MPPT charger.  It is worth noting that the MPPT charger allows me to charge Yet 1400 at 150w (adding charger from Yeti 400 also) from wall AC compared to ~60w with standard charger. Can combine wall AC charging with solar to speed recharging if necessary at max input charge is 350W.

It is worth noting that despite a higher battery capacity, the Yeti 3000 also has a maximum output of 1500W continuous (3000 surge) i.e. same at Yeti 1400.

So far I would recommend buying the Yet 1400.



  




ayrefan
8 posts
 
Stephendunn,

First off I should mention that despite being a Brit, I live in Melbourne Australia and all my Ayre gear was configured at the factory to run on 240v / 50-60hz.  I moved to Australia about 5 years ago from Denver Colorado which is where I met Charley Hansen.  My Ayre components were shipped to Melbourne.  Therefore my Yeti 1400 puts out 230v / 50hz which seems to still work fine for the Ayre QX-5 20 and AX-5 20.

So today with a few more hours running time on the Yeti 1400 I have compared running: 
1. the QX-5 directly from the Yeti via Ayre PC (though I had to use a US to Aus plug adapter as PC has US plug)
2. QX-5 and AX-5 powered from the L-5xe connected to the Yeti 1400
3. QX-5 and AX-5 powered from the L-5xe connected to the AC outlet.  

Clear winner was option 2 ie powering everything with the Yeti 1400 via the L-5xe.  Significantly bigger soundstage in all dimensions with better spatial separation of instruments / vocals compared to wall AC power and still ahead of just powering the QX-5 (option 1) where soundstage was not quite as big or well defined.   Bass impact speed and depth are now just as good using Yeti option 2 as when using the AC outlet.  Quieter elements in some tracks are now also more clearly defined in terms of their resolution and within soundstage.  

So best SQ overall with Yeti 1400 connected to Ayre L-5xe power conditioner.  

I used the Yeti 1400 last night for 4 hrs to power my HT system (Oppo 203, Marantz AV8802A and three Exposure 3010S2 monoblocks plus AX-5 to combine for 5.1 system with KEF R series surrounds plus Blades. HSU VTF15 Sub powered separately from wall outlet.  

Turned out I got the best sound when just powering the Marantz with all else on wall AC power.  However most of the HT system is plugged into an Isotek Polaris power strip and not the Ayre L-5xe which likely accounts for this result (Ayre L-5xe far better at isolating components outputs).

So, I agree with your idea that the greater headroom between the load and maximum output provided by the Yeti 1400 over the 400 allows the 1400 to more rapidly respond to system load demands, certainly for my relatively low to mid-range power demands (150 to 170W).  Whether the fact that my system runs on 230V is making a difference compared to US 120V / 60hz, I leave for discussion by experts on the forum.  

I have not tried placing the Yeti 1400 on isolation footers but well worth testing.  The way I have my Quadraspire racks configured at the moment there is not enough vertical space to insert Nordost sort kones under the L-5xe.  I tried using some Isoacoustics Orea Indigos under the L-5xe but they just killed the richness of harmonics / musicality that using myrtle blocks provides. Charley Hansen insisted the L-5xe be placed on myrtle blocks and so far they are the best.  I’m not sure he would approve of the Nordost BC sort kones I have under the QX-5 and AX-5 which made the SQ slightly brighter but provided a big jump in soundstage which is a forte of the KEF Blade 2s.  While we are on the subject of isolators, adding Isoacoustics Gaia 1 footers to the Blade 2s also made a significant improvement in staging and clarity.
ayrefan
8 posts
 
Glennwdick,

A good question I like to know the answer to despite having already bought GZ gear.
ayrefan
8 posts
 
I have been using my Yeti 1400 for several weeks now and the fan has not activated at all during play with my Ayre AX-5 / QX-5 drawing a combined 150 to 170  watts.  Longest listening session has been 6 hours.  

The only time the fan activates is when I am recharging, which I do after and not during play.  The soundstage and many other aspects of SQ have continued to improve as if the Yeti is breaking in.  Yeti is connected to an Ayre L-5xe power conditioner.  Fan has not been an issue and SQ improvements have been significant.  
More to discover