+2 for pay no attention to ASR. As far as power conditioning is concerned there is a controversy sparked by misunderstanding. It is only needed in locales where the power supply is not tightly regulated or in areas served by old infrastructure or where a recent increase in population has resulted in a power demand that is taxing the power grid. Not everyone needs power conditioning and if it isn't needed it does no harm, but it does no good either. Hence the confusion. I live in South Florida and in the summer months in densely populated areas the voltage swing goes from ~105 to ~120vac. Especially during peak usage times this can affect audio performance. I use a PS Audio P20 and it smooths things out completely. I don't have to fuss with the bias on my tube amp any more and tube life is greatly extended. That is real world experience over the past 8 or 10 years.
Seeking a Power Conditioner
My system consists of the following:
- Martin Logan 11A Impression Loudspeaker (hybrid)
- Bryston 4B3 cubed power amp-300/channel into 8 and 500 into 4
- Bryston Bp-19 preamplifier
- Chord Qutest DAC with S Booster Linear power supply
- Lumin U2 mini streamer with LHY Linear power supply
- Read reviews on both Niagra 1200 & Puritan Audio PSM 156 power conditioners and the reviews were extremely positive. While reading I came accross a review of both products by Audio Science Review (ASR) who claims his reviews are objective with scientific data supplied and his reviews were not nearly as positive to say the least. Anybody have any thoughts on how I should proceed with the differing of opinions. Thank you.
- ...
- 16 posts total
- 16 posts total