Scott Nixon Tubedac = WOW


I literally connected my new to me, second hand, broken in, Scott Nixon tubedac + about 1 hour ago and boy am I impressed. It's being used in place of my Benchmark DAC1 right now.

There is more heft and realism thru the SN. The DAC1 is very detailed as most people have reported, however, I have been using the DAC1 since before I assembled my current system and did not realize how detailed it was until I compared it to the SN. It's like not noticing something is there until it's not.

The SN is a very "easy" dac to listen to so far. The best way I can describe it is that it just goes with the flow.

If I were a recording engineer, the DAC1 would be my choice. If I just want to listen to music, the SN is the one I would choose.

Overall, the DAC1 is the better of the two, but the SN more than holds it's own. Of course, it's only been an hour since I installed it in the system.
gherrera1

Showing 1 response by ponnie

Hello fellow SN fans. You have experienced what owners of the Scott Nixon Tube DAC have been reporting for a long while. I have a friend that has tried almost every dac you can think of under $2,500. He ended up with a SN Tub DAC. He didn't stop there he has another tube dac on his 2nd systema and a Chibi Dac (solid state SN DAC) (spelling) in his 3rd room. I have tried personally several of the DAC's he has had in my system and I can confirm the SN tube dac has more body on the instruments and vocals.
Spatial resolution is great too. The SN Tube DAC does not alter the sound spectrum. I appears to stay neutral.
There are a few other DAC's I'd like to hear such as the Mew PS Audio Powerwave gear, and a couple others but all of them cost over $2500. So for under $600 you really get a great DAC in a Scott Nixon Tube DAC. I've been enjoying mine for well over 4 years while being used on an Oppo at first and now an Arcam DV78 which sounds remarkable. I like the fact that some of my bright CD's don't have that zippy top end with the SN DAC. Enjoy