Schumann Resonator

@stringreen - I like to thank the OP for starting this post.  This is the first time I've heard of SR and the tweak is cheap to try.

@Mahgister, thanks for sharing your tips

I find this SR speculation/discussion fascinating.   Physics vs biological, maybe both?  Perhaps there is not a direct correlation aka other factors or layers are involved.  Hard to pinpoint because the "perceived" SR improvements are not measurable.

Just because you don’t understand doesn’t make it false, the logic doesn’t follow.
The amount of knowledge we have about the universe is 0.0000....%
Just because you don’t understand and/or don’t experience it doesn’t make it placebo. Try a simple blindfold test.
I don’t understand the source of gravity but I know it’s there.
I love my wife but how do you measure love? How do you know it’s there?
Our audio acuity is much more complex than current science can define.
Happiness/joy is a higher goal than understanding. Some find joy in understanding.

The $10 is minuscule compared to the cost of High-End Audio components.  I’m guessing more people than not find audio improvement using SR aka the odds are that you will find improvement also.

@thecarpathian

Love as an emotion cannot be scientifically quantified.
A machine that creates a specific resonance can.

Sorry, I have limited experience with androids

"The amount of knowledge we have about the universe is 0.0000....%"
You are confusing the word ’we’ with the word ’I’.

So if I say, "We are humans" for you I should use "I"?

"I don’t understand the source of gravity but I know it’s there."
The source of gravity is literally any and everything that has mass.

This has that is not the same as how or why

@Mahgister

I know perfectly well how to read the English of very good writer, and consequently know that mine is very bad and approximative at best...

I think you are short changing yourself.  Few can be very good writers, but the main point of writing is to communicate, in which you do exceptionally well.  Your English grammar is on par with the rest of us.  

@ thecarpathian

You made the analogy between the emotion of love and a Schumann Resonator.
I pointed out this is a false equivelancy. I have no idea why you are now alluding to androids.

Your misinterpreting the analogy. If you follow the logic to the last statement the point is you don’t have to know how it works, just enjoy that it does.

Your statement that "we" have 0.0000% knowledge about the Universe is incorrect. ’We’ as in humans have a much greater understanding of the Universe percentage wise. If you personally do not, then "I" would be correct.
And again, no idea why you would call a single human "we".

My bad. I meant to write 0.0000...1% which likely lead to this misunderstanding. Also, "knowledge of the universe" didn’t mean knowledge "of" the universe, but understanding all there is to know about the universe aka all the information the universe has to offer. By "we" I mean mankind. We know a lot more now than say 400 years ago, but it’s miniscule to what is left to discover. We know very little of the unexplored deep depths of the ocean bottom which is in our own back yard. If the universe is estimated at 13.8 billion years, how much of it did we really know about it today relative to everything there is to know? For the creationist, how can you compare our knowledge to the creator? My point, which I’m probably doing a lousy job of, is that mankind know very little of all the is to know, but some folks insist on understanding before trying the SR. Mankind may not have the knowledge/science yet to explain it.
When you corrected with "I", I thought you meant don’t speak for everybody, but my intended "we" meant mankind knows very little of all there is to know which I believe is a universal truth.

You clearly stated you did not understand the source of gravity.
I gave you the answer.
I’m quite aware that is not the same as how or why there is gravity.
No idea why you felt the need to state that fact.

Again my bad. I incorrect used the word "source" which by definition means "a place, person, or thing from which something comes or can be obtained", what I really meant was how or why gravity works. My point is you don’t have to know how it works to enjoy it. The same goes for "love".

Apologies for the misunderstandings which lead to my unwarranted somewhat sarcastic remark.  I pride myself in having decent communication skills but this time seems I failed miserably.