Satellite vs. Cable


I'm comparing my local cable company (Patriot Media) to the regional phone company (Verizon) for combined TV/internet/phone. Verizon resells Direct TV pending completion of fiber-to-the-home in my area. Surprisingly after negotiating the two offers are practically the same price (well below either company's published rates!) So I'm looking for a reason to favor one over the other.

1. Is HDTV over Direct TV satellite any better than CATV HDTV? On some CATV digital channels I've noticed compression problems and poor blacks & grey-scale, but I have yet to install an HD set to see if these problems occur with CATV HDTV.

2. Is Satellite TV still problematic in bad weather?

3. Is the phone company's dedicated DSL service at 3MB down/768MB up faster than CATV's advertised 3MB shared-media ethernet?

Any other considerations?

Thanks,

Dave

dgarretson

Showing 1 response by edesilva

It is impossible to generalize the performance aspects of SAT v. CATV. Your SAT performance will heavily depend on how clear of a line of site you have to the horizon where the satellites are. Your cable performance will depend on which company is in your area, the state of their plant, and where you are on a particular line. My Comcast service is pretty good and I had lousy experiences w/DirecTV. But, if I lived in a Comcast community about 4 miles away, I'd go the other direction.

The cable system isn't some unified creature. Its made up of several large companies who became large by eating smaller cable companies. The plant in your area depends upon who they acquired and how recently the plant was updated. So, no generalizations.

I actually want FiOS, but it isn't available in my area. Darn it.