Rushton's DIY approach to ultrasonic record cleaning published by Positive Feedback


Over the past several months I’ve invested a fair amount of time exploring ultrasonic cleaning because I’ve fallen way too far behind in my record cleaning. With over 6000 LPs, I needed a faster way to clean than my trusted multi-step manual wet/vac cleaning process. That manual process got the best results I’ve ever found, but I was not keeping up with my collection and it is just painful to me to play a record that I’ve not cleaned.

In exploring ultrasonic cleaning, my hope was to find that I could complete multiple LPs in a single US cleaning cycle and greatly speed up my rate of cleaning records. My goals were to FIRST do no harm and then SECOND see how close I could get to the results of my manual cleaning regimen.

My past experiences with ultrasonic cleaning demonstrations were completely underwhelming. What I heard did not approach the excellence I was achieving with my multi-step wet/vac cleaning regimen.

What I’ve learned, and now apply in my new ultrasonic cleaning regimen, are multiple elements to the cleaning process that must be used in combination to achieve the best possible results. And these results have far exceeded my expectations.

I’d thought of posting here on Audiogon the summary of what I’ve learned and am now applying as my new record cleaning regimen, but the inability to post images and to apply formatting here caused me to send my summary to David Robinson at Positive Feedback who has graciously published my comments as a guest essay. Please read that essay, and then come back here to Audiogon with comments and to share your experiences:

http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/rushton-paul-diy-approach-ultrasonic-cleaning-lps/


I look forward to some further discussion and sharing of experiences.

.


128x128rushton
@scm,

I’d agree with you on more of everything coming through. I’d just add that the soundstage is more expansive on all fronts. I now do not want to listen to any lp that hasn’t been cleaned by this new cleaner even though I had a great (what I thought was great) system previously. The other thing noticed is, there is much more static removed by this new set-up.

Even on lps I had previously cleaned, I’m noticing how much crud is in the new water of this recent set-up. Pretty remarkable!
Hi Rushton,

Sorry if I missed this part of the discussion, but how did you end up deciding on three revolutions (0.3 RPM for 10 minutes) for the cleaning cycle?  Ten minutes seems like a good amount of time based on various peoples' results, but I'm not sure if three cycles of wet/dry for any particular spot of the record is going to do any good.  Why not just do one revolution for 10 minutes (0.1 RPM)?
This is awesome, thanks for contributing to all!

I'm having a tough time finding Hepastat 256 in the Toronto area. Will any quat do? I found Epquat by Lawrason local to me which apparantly does all the same germ/virus/bacteria killing that Hepastat does.

Would Epquat be ok, and what are the differences if anyone knows?

Thanks guys!


This thread is why I love AG forums 
thanks for the contribution all but especially OP

@rushton Having gone through this thread and looking into different ultrasonic cleaning tanks I find a wide range of quality tanks and pricing.  That said how has the Trusonic holding up for yu.  If you were to purchase an ultrasonic cleaning tank today would you upgrade, and if so to what unit?  The Trusonic 10 Liter 40 khz unit seems to get the job done.  The Vibrato units look good, but are out of stock.  The Sonix4 ST126H looks pretty good for a commercial unit.  Thanks.