Rowland Model 5 vs. McCormack DNA-1?


Has anyone compared (or care to share an opinion on) an upgraded McCormack DNA-1 (mine has the Revision B from SMc Audio) vs. the Jeff Rowland Model 5? Have been window shopping and am curious as to how these two stack up. If I keep the McCormack it'll go back to SMC for the full upgrade treatment. Going with a Model 5 would mean eventually getting a second one and using them bridged. Cost either way would be the same (~$3K). Or are there other recommendations in this price range that offer more?

Keep in mind that the speakers are Hales Revelation 3s which are a hungry 4 Ohm load; both these amps put out 300+ watts into that load. The pre- is a SF Line 1; source is CAL Alpha/Delta (CD only).

My music preference is mostly small acoustic and jazz ensembles with the occassional rock, blues or other genre excursion. Any improvement in the overall sound would be welcomed. The sound is currently fairly well balanced, but certainly not perfect. As always, thanks for the input.
fpeel

Showing 1 response by cornfedboy

fpeel: i'd suggest looking at a pair of jrdg model one's run bridged. you should be able to find a pair within your budget. these amps are of a newer design than the 5, put out 360 w into 4 ohms and, in my experience sound much better than the 5, alone or bridged. i owned a pair of jrdg one's for several years, which i used to drive, seriatim, soundlab dynastats, ae-1's (with a pair of entec lf-20's) and avalon eclipses (with a muse model 18). i've listened to the mccormack a number of times but neither a/b'd it with jrdg gear or owned one. -kelly