Hey,
I "Mirror" luisma31 post.
I too have the RME. His remarks are spot on.
And I have a tube DAC (Musical Paradise MP D1 MKII with upgraded caps and 6922 tubes) which I enjoy as well.
The DAC's are at opposite ends of the audio spectrum.
Yes, the RME is crystal clear with no digital glare or harshness but the sound stage is a bit narrow and shallow.
The MP DAC o.t.h. is lush and full. It has a wonderful expansive sound stage.
The RME is a bit better at "hearing into" the mix (detail).
Truth be told; I can listen to either for hours with no listening fatigue.
That being said; The MP DAC is about 9 years old.
I wanted to ask Luisma about the sound qualities of the Audio Mirror Tubidour III.
What is your opinion of the Audio Mirror unit?
Is it detailed as well as being musical?
That would seem to be the ideal character for a DAC.
Thanks very much.
I "Mirror" luisma31 post.
I too have the RME. His remarks are spot on.
And I have a tube DAC (Musical Paradise MP D1 MKII with upgraded caps and 6922 tubes) which I enjoy as well.
The DAC's are at opposite ends of the audio spectrum.
Yes, the RME is crystal clear with no digital glare or harshness but the sound stage is a bit narrow and shallow.
The MP DAC o.t.h. is lush and full. It has a wonderful expansive sound stage.
The RME is a bit better at "hearing into" the mix (detail).
Truth be told; I can listen to either for hours with no listening fatigue.
That being said; The MP DAC is about 9 years old.
I wanted to ask Luisma about the sound qualities of the Audio Mirror Tubidour III.
What is your opinion of the Audio Mirror unit?
Is it detailed as well as being musical?
That would seem to be the ideal character for a DAC.
Thanks very much.