I can’t believe that some are talking about ripping to mp3!? I don’t even rip to FLAC, I choose AIFF or WAV. I mean, storage is not a problem, so why bother with FLAC. If you can’t hear the difference between mp3 and a lossless file type, you need your ears tested
Ah, that old chestnut, MP3 v higher bitrates?
Well, I’d defy you, or anyone else, to tell the difference between MP3 192kbps and anything higher.
Unsighted of course.
As far as I’m aware, no human being reliably can.
It’s hard enough distinguishing 128kbps from 192kbps.
So enough with yet more misleading MP3 bashing.
Let’s not also forget that MP3 still remains the most compatible file format in the world even today.
You can play back MP3s on virtually anything, add album art and metadata with ease, normalise tracks or albums with MP3 Gain and edit to your heart’s desire on software like Audacity if you so wish.
That said, as an archival format, FLAC is to be recommended and it does gradually seems to be replacing MP3.
No doubt in time it will become equally as compatible and versatile as MP3 is right now, but some of us resent having to wait.