2. member-reviews
  3. 1032806442

Review: Chiro C-200 Amplifier

Category: Amplifiers

Jazz, New Age, and female vocals are what I listen to the majority of the time. The most important aspect of reproduced sound is getting a sense of being "there". My pet peeves are too much bass and upper frequency "shrillness".

The Chiro C-200 has been my primary amp for about 6 months. I got a great deal on a used piece locally and jumped on it. It replaced an Acurus A150 which was in the same league.

The Acurus is a great amp. It has better bass "slam" than the Chiro but is inferior in all other areas. The Acurus tried too hard to be clean, and has an over sterile quality that I do not apprecaite. It does not convey the music with the same sense of realism thast the Chiro does. The biggest difference I found is that the Chiro has better resolving power. There is simply more music with the Chiro, and it seems to be more in control. Imaging ans sounstaging are more focused and deeper (instruments and voices do not jump around anymore). The Chiro handles the high notes with significantly more "naturalness" than the Acurus, which I sometimes found a little foggy.

All in all, the Chiro was the amp to beat for <1k. It is a few years old now, and Kinergetics is no longer in business, but great deals can be had on second hand units. (If you do a search in audioasylum.com there is some info about guys that are servicing these, however it has become a little dated) Build quality is top notch, and the unit runs fairly cool even with the 84db sensative Solos.

The conclusion is this; The Acurus are great amps. It is neck and neck with the Chiro in many areas. The difference is in overall resolution and the upper frequency presentation, the stuff you pay the big bucks for. The Chiro does it better, significantly.

For under $400 bucks, this is a great amp that gives the listener a taste of the high end.

If money was no object, would you still own this?
Are you kidding me? I am a grad student on an an ultra tight budget, if money was no object I would be listening to ML#33s or a pair of Halcros.

Bottom line;

The Chiro C-200 is a sweet amp that can be had for next to nothing. (I got mine for $250)

Associated gear
Platinum Audio Solo's
Rotel Preamp
Ixos biwire speaker cables
Ixos gamma 1000 interconnect for pre-pow
Tributaries sca-300 for cd-pre
Marantz cc-52

Similar products
Acurus
Adcom
Rotel
Conrad Johnson Sonographe
128x128robr45
jsujo
348 posts
 
I also picked up a Chiro C-200 amp from Audiogon. I just dont find much wrong with this amp. It seems to be quite effortless in everything it does,,and that is with only 2 40kuF capacitors...my amp has an issue in that I cant turn it off with the front button,,I have to unplug it...

I feel that maybe because it sounds so good and its cheap, that Its a good candidate for upgrades by a tech.
My chiro is driving JBL L-96, which are 89dB/W. preamp is a David Berning TF-10 tubed pre and Parasound CDP-2000 CD player/
dckid
7 posts
 
This is my second review. I've had the amp since last March (2003) and I still love the sound. But.... I'm getting big time turn-on transients and more often than not, one of the channels will cut out at startup (usually the left side). Sometimes I have to turn it off and back on 10 or more times to get it working right. Has anybody had a similar problem and know the root cause and have a solution?
tal88
2 posts
 
sorry, I can't help on the issues some are having. I have the five channel version of this amp I bought locally for $600! That is about $120 per channel. Not bad. This amp is a great deal in the 2, 3, or 5 channel versions. I'd like to pick up some more just to run other channels. It is probably the best out there for the money.
dwild1
1 posts
 
Recently purchased a Chiro 200 on eBay and am thrilled. Moved out my B&O S75 speakers from the stereo system to the theater room and brought my B&W Matrix 801 S2's to the 2 channel room. Pulled out my B&K ST202 plus and started pulling out the vinyl. Wow, the sound stage got not only deeper and wider but therer was height! Even with 140 WPC to the B&K's 200, the bass was tighter and more defined. The B&K had a tube like sound that didn't mate as well with the 801's, they opened up with the Chiro. Transients are better on this amp also. I felt as if I was listening to music, not electronics. I am going to sell the B&K along with a Hafler DH200 and settle in for a long life with this amp.
The equipment this system are: Yamaha CX2 preamp, Sony DVP-S550 DVD/CD, Akai GX-F71 cassette, Akai GX-626 reel to reel, Linn Axis T/T w/Basik plus arm w/Yamaha MC501 m/c cart,Rotel RQ 970BX phono preamp, Sony SAT-A55 sat rcvr, Panamax Max500 DBS, Monster Cable and AudioQuest cales and interconnects.
More to discover