I used the PiaB with the RM10 as well and it worked very, very well, but I didn't have the K&K at the time. You should call Roger to hear his side of the attenuator versus TVC approach, the fella at Goldpoint said pretty much the same thing and it seems to make theoretical sense, and it sure worked in my system. Interesting, Roger also makes an RM4 or 5 preamp that has a built in phone stage and operates as pure passive for a linestage, same potentiometer as the one in the PiaB (a 1960s Noble that Roger said would be too expensive to make today). That being said, I think there is some consensus that John Chapman does great work and his TAP is among the very best passives available -- On the other hand, if your thinking about the RM10 you might want to investigate Roger's preamp.
Resitor Passive
It seems there is a majority view that TVCs "blow away" resistor based passives. I wonder if anyone out there has come to a different conclusion. It seems that in theory, a high quality attenuator could some benefits over a device sending a signal through a transformer. Interested in any experiences or opinions on the subject. Thanks.
8 responses Add your response