tlg- i was in your shoes about 1 year ago. ok, we know what cable can do for audio, so based on what i wanted 'more' of in the rear channels, i went to a car audio specialist (they usually carry a variety of by-the- foot cable on some type of spool) and picked up some cable that promised more base definition, and clear highs. from car audio specialist, mind you. again- i only went to them because they offer variety and low pricing. the cable is stiff, black sheathed, copper with silver, 14guage, and i believe i paid less than 1.00 canadian per foot. i was running cheap monster cable to my rear channels originally, still costing well more than the current ones. did i notice a difference? yes, much better than the originals, i could hear extension in the highs, creating more ambience and, during the pod race in "the phantom menace" i swear there is lower frequency info that i now hear. so, my opinion is that unless you are running a serious high end ht set up, i would not spend terrible amounts of money on rear effects cables. but, as any audiophile knows, clear defined highs, fast and detailed, can provide info that will only enhance the ambient spaces so important to good ht presentation. good luck, good ht is highly entertaining and fun. fotis_k
Rear surround sound speaker cables
I have an Audio Refinement preamp (pre2dsp) and amp (multi 5), Vandersteen 2ce signatures and one Vandersteen 2wq subwoofer, Vandersteen vcc1 center channel, and I am thinking about getting the Vandersteen VLR's as rears. The question is how good do the speaker cables have to be that would be going to the rears? I know people spend a lot of money for the fronts, including myself. I prefer audioquest cables.
2 responses Add your response