Quad 989 vs. SoundLab Millennium 2


I live in a rural area and cannot compare these at dealers. But I know enough from using ESL 63s for a few years and having heard A1 and A3s that either the 989 or M2 will be my next speaker. Anyone heard either or have comments on sonic comparisons? Thanks, Jeffrey email or 805 434 9220 California
jeffreyfranz

Showing 1 response by rleff

I own m2's and drive them with audiovalve challanger 180 monoblocks and jeff roland model 6 monoblocks.
My speakers have tordial transformer,impedance mod and copper diffusion ring.
I moved from Dunlavy sc3's to the m2's and have been extremely impressed with them.I have not experienced any reliablity problems or hard failures since I bought them used here on Audiogon over 2 yrs ago.I do not leave them on 24/7 but this is just my preference;it does take a little more than 1 hr to sound their best after powering up but the tube amps do as well.
I play music ranging from Diana Krull,Choir with organ,Eric Clapton and even Pink Floyd performs in my living room;all I can say is they play everything I can throw at them and it is extremely enjoyable.
When I switch to the Roland amps they play very close to the sound of the tubes but I find the tube sound to be a little bit more involving with the music but again probally just a personel preference;I could easily live with the Rolands alone if I had too without regret.
I have never heard a quad speaker so I can not compare the m2 to them;but if you can listen to a soundlab it should be heard.