Interesting take over at the avsforum. I felt the M10 sounded better. Maybe the synergy between the M12/17 is really good.
So I did a head to head of my Nad M12 an the M10.
Using the pre-outs on both, feeding into my amp a M17, toggling them back and forth.
(And I did this as a blinded test with both me and my wife)
Streaming through Roon, the m12 wins. Not by a huge amount, but a noticeable amount.
The M12 has more dynamic range, more depth. It seems more full.
The M10 is slightly more flat, seems muddy in given ranges.
And the same can be said of using the M10 amp (speakers).
The M12 / m27 still wins.
So I was hoping this was a one box solution. But sadly, no. So I am sending the M10 back.
So I did a head to head of my Nad M12 an the M10.
Using the pre-outs on both, feeding into my amp a M17, toggling them back and forth.
(And I did this as a blinded test with both me and my wife)
Streaming through Roon, the m12 wins. Not by a huge amount, but a noticeable amount.
The M12 has more dynamic range, more depth. It seems more full.
The M10 is slightly more flat, seems muddy in given ranges.
And the same can be said of using the M10 amp (speakers).
The M12 / m27 still wins.
So I was hoping this was a one box solution. But sadly, no. So I am sending the M10 back.