PS AUDIO bhk pre-amp vs upper level reference pre-amps?


I’m looking for some feedback from people who have replaced their more costly reference pre-amps with a PS audio bhk or have heard it up against such units.
Im currently using an Audio Research ref 6 between a PS audio direct stream memory player and dac with the the bhk 300 mono amps. Would the synergy with a bhk pre in my system be worth replacing my pre?
Mike
hiendmmoe

Showing 1 response by verdantaudio

In your system, you might like the BHK.  I replaced an Ayre K-5xeMP with the BHK and it was a step up once I rolled in some NOS tubes.  I replaced the BHK with an Art Audio Conductor.  

Note:  The stock PSVanes are not ideal in the BHK.  I found it disappointing with the stock tubes.  Kevin Deal sells a set of NOS Tunsgrams that are spectacular with it.  

I kept all three for a stretch and did some ABC testing when I started distributing the Art Audio line of equipment.  

The BHK excels in a fully balanced system.  Whether it will be a better fit for yours is a matter of taste.  The advantage of the BHK is it is a bit more flexible in terms of Tube rolling.  I opted against an ARC preamp given the limited choice of 6H30s.  

The BHK will probably not be “better”.  You aren’t going to get improved resolution or a bigger soundstage anything of that sort.  But it may be close to a push vs. the ARC or it may have a more appealing sound profile at a fraction of the price and will allow you to go from two remotes to one.  

Incidentally, in systems that are not fully balanced, the BHK was a step down from the Art Audio.  With single ended amps the BHK is a bit disappointing but that seems to be the case with virtually every fully balanced unit I have heard.  They always seem to need to be fully balanced from source to output to get the most out of them.