i'm in the upgrade the amp before the speakers camp. there's nuthin really wrong with you nad, but it's not the last word in delicacy or transparency and might not be the best match for the pardaigms, which are fine, transparent speakers. it think you might have better results with a more revealing amp such as the above-mentioned creek, or naim/esoteric/arcam to name a few. i also doubt whether "upgrading" from the paradigm to dynaaudio or proacs would be a significant improvement--i would personally choose the pardaigms over the dynaudios; i do think the proacs are a very good, lively rocknroll speaker, but again, i'd first look at the amp.
Proac 1SC vs Dynaudio Focus 140
I am looking to upgrade my current system in my two channel listening room (about 12'x14'), and plan to upgrade my speakers first. Current components are an NAD C372 integrated and Arcam CD73 as the primary source, driving a pair a Paradigm Studio 20's (V1). I am contemplating Proac 1SC's or Dynaudio Focus 140's. I am looking at buying used, and my location will not allow me to demo at home. I have heard both in different stores and have been very impressed with both speakers. My listening tastes lean towards classic rock, contemporary easy listening, and acoustic guitar music.
Has anyone had the chance to do a direct comparison? If so, what would you consider the strengths and weaknesses of each, and which did you prefer ? Also, how much of a step up would these be from my current Paradigm 20's?
I realize my current system will not allow me to take full advantage of what these speakers have to offer, but I have to start somewhere.
Thanks in advance.
Mike.
Has anyone had the chance to do a direct comparison? If so, what would you consider the strengths and weaknesses of each, and which did you prefer ? Also, how much of a step up would these be from my current Paradigm 20's?
I realize my current system will not allow me to take full advantage of what these speakers have to offer, but I have to start somewhere.
Thanks in advance.
Mike.
5 responses Add your response