Pro-ject RM RPM 5 5.1 6 6.1etc. Owners Fixed


I own a Pro-ject RM6 SB turntable and love the turntable. However, it has always had a low end rumble once the needle hits the record. I tried ignoring it attributing the issue to record surface noise or one of the other compromises of living with vinyl. I recently discovered that this is a common problem with many Pro-ject models. At the urging of my not-so-local dealer I replaced the OEM footers with a set of threaded Edensound brass footers which yielded a dramatic improvement in everything except the rumble (I consider THREADED brass footers a mandatory investment). I then placed a cork mat between the subplatter and platter and silicone between the cartridge and headshell, minimal improvement if any on those two. The low end rumble continued and it really wasn’t that noticeable or intrusive once the music started, or so I thought.
I started my internet search and found a bunch of postings about the rumble problem inherent with certain Pro-ject TTs. There’s even a youtube video on the problem. I then came across a site from an RPM5 owner who claimed to have resolved the rumble problem found in Pro-ject turntables. He shows the before and after effects graphically on a spectrum analyzer identifying the low-end rumble with peaks at 50 and 100hz before and after his method of fixing it. Go here if you want to read more.

http://www.theapplechap.com/TheAppleChap/Blog/Entries/2011/5/24_Enhancing_the_sound_from_Pro-ject_turntables_by_removing_rumble.html

He provides a beautiful narrative on the fix and his science seems solid, but obtaining the parts needed seems a little complicated and he is waiting for Pro-ject to come up with a retrofit solution. Anyway, I discovered the repair can be done easily, for cheap, and now. Using his method, kind of, the fix is to install four rubber grommets (I’m not saying or recommending that you should do this, I just want to share my story). Based on the AppleChap’s approach, I went to Grainger.com and ordered a package of 1/8” ID 3/16”OD rubber grommets part number 3MRT4. They don’t sell them individually so I had to purchase a packet of 100 for an astounding $4.20 plus shipping.
The grommets arrived 3 days later. I then removed the platter, located the 4 screws that hold the rubber suspension (rubber band) in place. I removed one screw, inserted the grommet around the washer surrounding the screw and re-screwed it in place. It might be a little tricky at first as the suspension is tightly fit. I did this three more times, and four minutes later I was done. An important note the rubber band fits between the lips of each grommet, not above or below, unlike the pictures shown in AppleChap’s method. This isolates and decouples the rubber band from the screw and plinth. Also, I had to make sure that the screws were placed back correctly because any shift in the motor’s original position may cause the edges of the motor to touch the rubber grommet. If that would have happened I could have shaved the side of the lip of each grommet that faces the motor.
I returned the platter to its home and played a record. The second the needle hit the record, there was no rumble. It had disappeared, like magic. The grommets not only eliminated the rumble, but it cleaned up the soundstage and things that were previously masked were revealed. An amazing transformation! AppleChap also recommends changing the belt to a round instead of flat belt; less surface area to transfer resonance. I ordered a belt but it had not arrived yet.
cinellipro
As mentioned in the above posting, eliminating resonance due to motor vibration for many Pro-ject turntables is a two-step process. The first relates to the resonance onto the plinth caused by the vibrating motor and the second relates to the resonance on the subplatter caused by the vibrating motor and transferred by the belt. In my system, installing the grommets into the suspension and replacing the belt has made a significant improvement. I ordered the rubber belt from Turntableneedles.com. The part number is RBM19.5 and is identified as a medium round belt measuring 19.5 inches selling for $16.95+shipping. The drive belt arrived today and I installed it on the RM6 SB. Unlike the Pro-ject OEM belt which is loosey goosey and flat, this one is more rigid and round. The new belt did not fit any tighter and being round should equate to less surface area on the vibrating motor pulley and the subplatter.
In my system I can confirm that the improvements were dramatic and well worth the $28 investment (grommets and belt).
I’m not a journalist, but I can describe the soundstage as having even greater clarity with the new belt. The instrument placement across the soundstage is more solid and stable. I did not notice any more bass, but what bass there is has become more articulate. The background noise has become darker during low- level passages. And what sticks out the most are the little details in the music being clearer and more noticeable now.
Good luck and happy listening
Hello both,

regarding the position of the o-ring in relation to the grommets, I found placing it above the grommet below the screw head gave me better clearance from the plinth. Either way is OK so choose what works for you best. This fix is as much art as science so play with some of the options if you don't immediately get the improvement in sound you are looking for.

The key is definitely the new belt. This really brings the improvement to life.

FYI keep an eye on the blog on my site (www.TheAppleChap.com) as the official fix is nearing completion and I should be posting a review in a few weeks time as soon as it is ready.
All the best

Alan (TheAppleChap)
Alan,
I've been reading your previous postings. Excellent job! Has Pro-ject ever admitted that that they have a design flaw?
Cheers
I've seen the charts and listened to the before and after on my turntable and it is evident that the changes are profound and necessary to transform the turntable.

I believe that every Pro-ject table with the the O-ring suspension suffers from the low-level rumble problem, not just a few. It may not be detectable in all systems as they may not produce soundwaves as low as 50hz., and it may be too sublte for others (or those unaware) to even notice, but unless these turntables are made by hand then every one should have the same anamoly.
Regarding the placement of the suspension o-ring directly attached to each screw, it seems that the vibration would channel into the plinth through the screw. Wouldn't a rubber grommet with LIPS decouple the suspension from the screw and plinth? Wait I'm not an engineer so I'm guessing.
Show me the charts!
Thank you! Thank you! I will do the grommets and belt upgrade to my RM6... can't wait.

The suspension design is inherently flawed. All they've done is shift the vibration directly to the platter... instead of moving the vibration into the plinth. Bad design. My workaround was to screw down the motor with the shipping transport screws... which really helped reduce the rumble... but added some other slight resonances.. but not bad compared to Pro-ject's intended design. What were they thinking? "Let's float a buzzing motor and connect it to the platter!" That maximizes the buzzing to the needle. Maybe next year they will put the motor into the tonearm... haha.. I'm a little irritated that such a nice table has such a bad design for vibration control... from a leader in the industry. And the solution isn't expensive... so why aren't they at least offering an upgrade kit? Just weird.

Regardless, thanks for the fix idea. :) :)