Poor grammar is disappointing and decidedly distracting in formal audio reviews.


I find the majority of formal audio reviews across numerous publications to be easy reads.  However, I can barely put together a coherent thought when reading anything by Jason Kennedy, editor of the-ear.net.  It is as if he does not understand the limitation of use of a comma.  Do the English really have that much of a different implementation of the english language versus Americans?  Does anybody else struggle to read certain editors' work?
mganga

Showing 1 response by ibmjunkman

I keep a list.

brake vs break

lose vs loose

by vs bye vs buy

there vs their vs they're 

aisle vs isle

collage vs college

passed vs past

ben vs been

an vs and

ware vs wear

worn vs warn

threw vs through (thru)

sell vs sale

then vs than

light vs lite

too vs to vs two

waist vs waste

flower vs flour

fair vs fare

aloud vs allowed

nada vs notta 

dam vs damn

plain vs plane

descent vs decent

sore vs soar

advice vs advise

ad (abbreviation for advertisement) vs add

wary vs weary

latter vs ladder

vein vs vane

fourth vs forth  (have a happy one either way)