Phono Stage - The great analog tragedy


In the world of analog playback, there is an interesting observation. There has been tremendous innovation in the field of 
Turntable - Direct, Idler, Belt
Cartridge - MM, MC, MI
Tonearm - Gimbal, Unipivot, Linear Tracking

For all of the above designs we find some of the best reference components designed in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s. Most of the modern products are inspired from these extraordinary products of the past. But when it comes to phono stage, there is hardly any "reference component" from that era. They just standardized RIAA curve for sanity and left it. Manufacturers made large preamps and amps and allocated a puny 5% space for a small phono circuit even in their reference models, like a necessary evil. They didn’t bother about making it better. 

The result? It came down to the modern designers post 2000 after vinyl resurgence to come up with serious phono stages for high end systems. Unfortunately they don’t have any past reference grade designs to copy or get inspired from. Effectively, just like DACs, reference phono stages is also an evolving concept, and we don’t have too many choices when we want a really good one which is high-res and natural sounding. Very few in the world have figured out a proper high end design so far. And most of the decent ones have been designed in the past couple of decades. The best of the breed are probably yet to come.  

It is a tragedy that our legendary audio engineers from the golden era didn’t focus on the most sensitive and impactful component, "the phono stage"

pani

I don’t have the knowledge or experience to say anything of value to the OP. I can say that each succession of phonostages I have gone through have taken my vinyl playback to new levels. Lounge LCR MKIII, Sutherland 20/20, 47 Lab Arare and now a Phasemation E-350 all good and each beats the previous. 

The Phasemation E-350 is a Phon' that has been auditioned in a system that is not my own.

It has been used as a Phon' in a line up to be compared, it was new, only a few hours of usage.

As an experience and as an assessment, I recollect the 350 being quite impressive and was comfortable with the notion it was comparable in end sound produced to the most expensive in use during the demo's, which was a Valve Phono' with a suggested retail cost of near £10K.   

The 350 certainly was loaded on the back panel for options to attach to other devices, which is another Plus for it.   

Spec's across devices are not usually openly discussed at comparisons get togethers, the intention is to have a group Subjectively Assess the sound being produced in a particular system and environment.  

+2 on the EAR 912 I am amazed that only two posters mentioned it, along with most of de Paravicini's older phono stages which were all excellent and put most others to shame.

Is this a "what is the best phono stage" thread or is it a debate on very vintage vs less vintage (because a 25 year old phono stage design does not fit the conventional notion of "new", not that there is anything wrong with that) vs really new?