Phono Stage - The great analog tragedy


In the world of analog playback, there is an interesting observation. There has been tremendous innovation in the field of 
Turntable - Direct, Idler, Belt
Cartridge - MM, MC, MI
Tonearm - Gimbal, Unipivot, Linear Tracking

For all of the above designs we find some of the best reference components designed in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s. Most of the modern products are inspired from these extraordinary products of the past. But when it comes to phono stage, there is hardly any "reference component" from that era. They just standardized RIAA curve for sanity and left it. Manufacturers made large preamps and amps and allocated a puny 5% space for a small phono circuit even in their reference models, like a necessary evil. They didn’t bother about making it better. 

The result? It came down to the modern designers post 2000 after vinyl resurgence to come up with serious phono stages for high end systems. Unfortunately they don’t have any past reference grade designs to copy or get inspired from. Effectively, just like DACs, reference phono stages is also an evolving concept, and we don’t have too many choices when we want a really good one which is high-res and natural sounding. Very few in the world have figured out a proper high end design so far. And most of the decent ones have been designed in the past couple of decades. The best of the breed are probably yet to come.  

It is a tragedy that our legendary audio engineers from the golden era didn’t focus on the most sensitive and impactful component, "the phono stage"

pani

@lewm

Am no expert but don’t think that’s right re CR type filtering.  Pretty sure early Macs, Marantz 7, Fischer 400, and many others used negative feedback in their phono stages.  

It probably is the case that no one back then even thought of a phono stage as a separate component; that would explain the dearth of examples.  Back then, no one thought of power cords as discrete components either.  Also, the popularity of low output cartridges is a modern thing; their would have been no need for phono stages back then to work with such low output.

At this time to better the sound of MM, MI, and MC one needs to consider optical (DS Audio) and the available equalizers.  Vinyl appears to be maxed out technically and I wonder if manufacturers see that when considering product development.

The term “CR filter” as applied to an RIAA network means only that the RIAA curve is achieved using capacitors and resistors (also including the input or output impedance of a tube as part of the filter). Such a circuit can be passive or active and can use NFB or not. NFB and CR are two entirely different descriptors for the phono circuit.

As far as I can tell, “CR type” and “NFB” are typiically used interchangeably for “passive” and “active”, respectively.  That’s why I find it helpful to define terms, and also why I tend to assume others on this forum might know stuff I don’t.